Q Anon: 04/16/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 04/16/19 | FReepers, vanity

[grey_whiskers]

[grey_whiskers]

Tippy-Top.

[stylin19a]

that's scary

...if Congress wants to change the laws about obstruction of justice (i.e. to outlaw tweets, etc...)

I wonder how that jives with "Congress shall make no law..."

[grey_whiskers]

People who live in glass houses should beware of pigeons. :-D

[marajade]

Do you believe is Congress wanted to impeach and convict they’d let a little law about what is obstruction of justice get in the way?

[Aquamarine]

Didn't Q say “Bye Bye Rod Rosenstein” in the past?

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

He has done whatever he was supposed to do and its time to leave. Not a White hat, not a black hat. That he was kept on indicates that he provided access and information that could not otherwise be obtained. A dirty window into the world of the conspirators?

[generally]

So we are all celebrating the release of the Mueller report and that it completely exonerates POTUS. But here is what has been bothering me:

The report says that NO US PERSON was involved in colluding with the Russians. That seems to exonerate HRC, and all the derps, too. I probably need to go back and listen/read some more, but I didn’t see any comments here about that. Fellow FReeQs, is that what you heard? Didn’t that kind of make you wonder?

another theory....

X22 Report thinks that the Mueller report is full of lies and that Assange will be used to discredit it.

IIRC, the report states explicitly that the DNC emails were NOT leaked to Wikileaks by Seth Rich or ANY US person. What if Assange tells us that they were? That would call into question the entire report, wouldn’t it? Of course, getting one fact wrong doesn’t mean that you got all the facts wrong. But it would certainly beg a lot of questions. And then, of course, the derps would use that to say that it was wrong about exonerating the President. So where do we go from there?

[generally]

New Comey tweet:

https://twitter.com/Comey

So many answers.

[bitt]

radio people were saying that it sounds like Weissmann wrote the report.

that figures..

[Grimmy]

Imo, if we follow the pattern of events so far by the Trump team, then the grabbing of Assange now is no coincidence.

Mueller made his report. In that report are lies. Now Trump has the source that can open that can of worms.

What happens to a federal investigator that publishes lies in an official report?

Sometimes its easier to let people set themselves up for easy prosecution, then roll them on the tougher issues with it.

[grey_whiskers]

I'm not obfuscating anything. Marriage is either a sacrament defined by God, or a social construct used to guarantee (more or less) paternity and raise children, between one man and one woman.

Occasionally, there may be a patriarch (you know, like "patriarchy"?) where one or a number of rich guys get multiple wives.

But it isn't, nor has it ever been, between two guys.

Even going back to Petronius' SatyriconK where the two guys are chasing the pubescent boy around the kitchen, nobody pretended he was anything but a boy toy.

Not even in the Limey Poofter Navy ("Rum, sodomy, and the lash") even though it *does* bear a certain resemblance to 50 Shades of Ghey.

[grey_whiskers]

Only think of when I see that photo is the phrase “where the bodies are buried” (Standard Hotel and Muriatic acid excepted).

[TXnMA]

Nicely done collection! ThanQ!!!

Feels good, doesn't it? '-)

TXnMA
 

[stylin19a]

how can Congress make a law against free speech - outlaw tweets ?

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Psst! Your loaded truck parked on the side of the road in the Forbidden city?

(Don't need the details after you dispense this one!)

[cibco]

q

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

.

[grey_whiskers]

And speaking of trucks and things, look what the Trump Train conducted by Attorney General Barr, just did to a truckload of Mueller innuendo:

[Bigg Red]

Well, you are a sweetheart.