Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
Q-3254

This is the one where Q pastes statute Law regarding "Advocating overthrow of Government"

The PROBLEM IS ... As I read, it all of the circumstances described end with "by force or violence" ...meaning ... it would not work on a lot of the high-profile "white collar" Traitors ...

Then I remembered Q-1862 (amongst others), where Q hinted at a strategic use for Antifa.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/01/fbi-probe-antifa-ideology-underway-wray-tells-house-panel.html📁
What does WRAY know and when will he release to the PUBLIC?
Does such violence (extremism) justify NG deployment in the future ahead of 'planned' public releases?

Q could be reminding us that involvement with Antifa (or for that matter Hezbollah etc.) could be the opening to go after the "Elite" criminals.

925 posted on 03/29/2019 6:09:57 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Disestablishmentarian
Q-3254 This is the one where Q pastes statute Law regarding "Advocating overthrow of Government" The PROBLEM IS ... As I read, it all of the circumstances described end with "by force or violence" ...meaning ... it would not work on a lot of the high-profile "white collar" Traitors ... Then I remembered Q-1862 (amongst others), where Q hinted at a strategic use for Antifa. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/01/fbi-probe-antifa-ideology-underway-wray-tells-house-panel.html📁 What does WRAY know and when will he release to the PUBLIC? Does such violence (extremism) justify NG deployment in the future ahead of 'planned' public releases? Q could be reminding us that involvement with Antifa (or for that matter Hezbollah etc.) could be the opening to go after the "Elite" criminals. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Q has mentioned assassination threats/plans in their messages. Plus the Antifacrap, and who knows what else - how many 187'ed. I think that's enough "by force or violence".
947 posted on 03/29/2019 6:41:20 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian

Oops - reposting with the little dingbat that turned it into mishmash.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q-3254
This is the one where Q pastes statute Law regarding “Advocating overthrow of Government”

The PROBLEM IS ... As I read, it all of the circumstances described end with “by force or violence” ...meaning ... it would not work on a lot of the high-profile “white collar” Traitors ...

Then I remembered Q-1862 (amongst others), where Q hinted at a strategic use for Antifa.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/01/fbi-probe-antifa-ideology-underway-wray-tells-house-panel.html
What does WRAY know and when will he release to the PUBLIC?
Does such violence (extremism) justify NG deployment in the future ahead of ‘planned’ public releases?
Q could be reminding us that involvement with Antifa (or for that matter Hezbollah etc.) could be the opening to go after the “Elite” criminals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Q has mentioned assassination threats/plans in their messages. Plus the Antifacrap, and who knows what else - how many 187’ed. I think that’s enough “by force or violence”.


948 posted on 03/29/2019 6:42:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian; ransomnote
> "The PROBLEM IS ... As I read, it all of the circumstances described end with "by force or violence" ...meaning ... it would not work on a lot of the high-profile "white collar" Traitors "

No, there's no demarcation of 'white collar' traitors. However, there is a decision mark in traitor vs. plotter (more on this below).

Here's the help with clarification but first note that the Q team did not cite the entire statute which is what you're missing and one needs to pay attention to the or's in the statute:

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

______________________________________________
What is apparent is the debate at the level of POTUS and his lawyers whether to bring charges of treason or the lesser 'knowingly, with intent, organizes, helps, etc.' clause. Treason is punishable by death, the intentional is punishable by prison up to 20 years. Treason may apply to Clinton and others who sold SAPs to China and others. The lesser clauses may apply to Schiff and others.

Also by 'force' does not necessarily mean by force of arms, it can also be by process or procedural force.

954 posted on 03/29/2019 7:02:18 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

To: Disestablishmentarian

Q could be reminding us that involvement with Antifa (or for that matter Hezbollah etc.) could be the opening to go after the “Elite” criminals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sounds good. Coup by proxy would be expected (elites not wanting to get their hands dirty) and accommodated accordingly (treason). Especially when they pay for services rendered - without pay then no coordinated violence? Using Antifa as thug militia.


1,013 posted on 03/29/2019 9:25:04 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson