...DiGenova insists there shall be a Special Counsel appointed by Barr, to investigate all these charactors, if the FBI is ever to be restored with Trust...
I don’t think it would be an issue and it might be advantagious to do so. Does anyone have a different take?
Does anyone know if a new Special Counsel could just use all of the previous research done by IG Horowitz (Sp?) or Huber? If he can his report would come Quickly and contain a nice fully integrated package of all the crimes committed by all of the derps going back to at least 2015.
I don’t think it would be an issue and it might be advantagious to do so. Does anyone have a different take?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Q has several times stated that a Special Counsel takes years and is much less efficient or useful or some words to that effect, than what Huber is ALREADY doing right now and has for some time.
DiGenova is either out of the loop entirely or pretending he doesn’t know that investigations into this wrongdoing are happening right now and have been ongoing at least from 2018 or a bit before, I can’t remember dates.
So the idea that the FBI/DOJ etc wrongdoing needs to start to be investigated is actually quite silly.
My understanding is that an independet counsel (Ken Starr, for example) must work independently of all agencies and develop its own evidence. That law was sunsetted. A Special Counsel works for the Dept of Justice under the Attorney General or his/her designee.