Really? Q brings up the subject for investigation of parents of zero, asking us a question.
How is this forbidden on a Q thread?
First, let me explain that I'm not the BOSS of the thread or even a co-boss, and I'm not FORBIDDING anything, just rendering one man's opinion. AND I haven't surrendered my ALMONDS to JR.
So here goes, since you asked.
I thought ransomnote explained it very nicely, but let me go further because I'm not quite as polite as she is.
All you need to know to answer your question is right here;
I’ve seen it too. I know Q has asked about Obama’s parents speaking Russian, but the detailed level of the “birther” debates probably fall outside the focus of Q threads. Would it be possible to move the detailed parentage debates and theories to the main forum at this point, to avoid shifting the focus of the Q content to O’s genealogy? Q seems to be pointing to digs involving the (higher level) fact that his parents must have been CIA and to the revolting crimes of the “so-called” elites and RC right now. :)
Here are a couple of examples.
Q mentions that we are not alone in the universe (we aren't, of course) and next thing you know, some people want to talk about lizard people having infiltrated the government.
Q mentions JFKjr, and rather than talking about the DS taking him out to make way for Hillary (which I believe) we start showing pics of him alive, being at a Trump rally with his wife in disguise, being Q, and running the Q program.
Now Q mentions that Obama's parents learned Russian and were possibly CIA agents/assets (which I also believe, because Q said it), we all of a sudden get to Malcolm X is Obama's father.
So you see, I think (ME) it's best that we stay within the bounds of what Q is actually pointing at. People have a tendency to cross into the bounds of talk that gives ammunition to the enemy.
Without trying to sound like JR's biznatch, I do think he's "forbidden" the "birther" discussion for this very reason, though I didn't partake in that particular controversy. It likely became an embarrassment to the site and grist for people to call FR a kookoo bird site.
You must know this, you've read the Derp articles and also the threads beyond the trees here on FR.
It's disengenous to say that if Q mentions aliens, JFKjr, or Obama's parents then ANYTHING is fair game for discussion. There are strategic realities that must be considered. Why do you think Q backed off Nazi/Hitler talk?
Anyway, without trying to offend anybody, that's MY personal opinion, which I also have the right to, neh?
Take it or leave it. But since you asked.
I will not get into a long, drawn-out debate on this subject, because that too is not the purpose of this thread.
WWG1WGA
I personally feel it can be relevant but I’m willing to go along with the MoD.
I have a feeling the topic may be relevant once justice starts rolling along in the form of indictments/arrests and so on.