Q Anon: 02/24/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/24/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	Where We Go 1 We Go All	Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration. - 6 min
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Table	tang-soo et. al.	Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Dan Duval	Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread	Qmap.pub	QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
The Oracle	Bagster	The Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
Post	FReeQs	Technical Tips -Learn how to meme, post graphics, code HTML
	“Power to the People”
Twitter	Sara Carter	Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	John Solomon	Award winning investigative journalist sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	Praying Medic	Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website	Saul Montes-Bradley	Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube	X22 Report	Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube	In Pursuit of Truth	Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
Thread	Jim Robinson	Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
	“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images

[Publius]

In the end the Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of the pact. I would argue unconstitutionality on the basis of several angles, the foremost being Article IV's Guarantee Clause.

But I think the intention was to assign the electoral votes to the will of that state’s citizens, not other States.

The intent was that it reflect the will of the state's legislature, as elected by the citizens of the state. However, original intent has fared poorly in the federal courts. We live under the Living Constitution.

And what about the states that sign up illegals to vote when they give them driver’s licenses? And now ballot harvesting?

There is nothing specific in the Constitution that addresses these issues. We've had shady electoral processes ever since Andrew Jackson introduced broad-based democracy into our political system. The courts have been lenient in addressing these issues.

Are we supposed to just let it go, saying it’s somehow legal and there’s nothing we can do?

Unfortunately, yes. Only a constitutional amendment can address something so basic and so hard-coded into the Constitution.

Here is how I think it will play out. Let's assume for the moment that enough states sign on to the pact to activate it and Congress approves it.

If the Supreme Court strikes the pact down, we've dodged a bullet. If it accepts the pact, it will create such chaos that Congress will quickly write an amendment ending the Electoral College and going to direct popular vote for president. Note that Andrew Jackson proposed this in his first State of the Union letter in 1829, so it's not a new idea. To avoid further chaos, I would expect quick ratification by the states.

[TheTexasMom]

Thanks.

Will be more situationally aware in the future.

[John4.11]

Very interesting information, G_W. Thanks for posting that. I noticed we had a derp visitation today. There was just 1 posting, nobody responded and they left. I know that doesn’t always happen, but it did today!

[EasySt]

Good Questions!

Pehaps he hadn’t been leaned on to be part of the show yet.

[greeneyes]

I nominate you the official countdown person! Keep us informed daily if you please. I’d like that. OK?

[blu]

And here I thought those posts got pulled. Whatever. I still have them screencapped and saved.

Kit, would you mind posting your handy dandy screen cap of Hitler's posts? I'm thinking of just tossing them at him when he posts. That is all the attention he warrants. Well, justified, legal and moral attention.

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

That’ didn’t end well for Marie Antoinette .....

[EasySt]

Thanks Grey_Whiskers!

COINTELPRO techniques!

FReeQAnon Notable

[greeneyes]

LOL. I was watching the Yellow Vests in France recently. Everyone in their yellow vests and cell phones out recording.

It reminded me of Madame LeFarge knitting and knitting to record the evidence to use for the trials and beheadings to come.

I wonder if history is about to repeat itself? Seems to still be going pretty strong-not that our LSM will report it.

[Rusty0604]

Thanks, so everything is useless, thanks.

[EasySt]

Don’t think he said that...

But this was in there...

“Supreme Court strikes the pact down, we’ve dodged a bullet.?”

[Publius]

Not everything. I believe a few red states signed on to the pact in prior years. The people of those states need to get their state legislature to pull out of the pact. That would set it back a ways.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Thanks GW; I imagine Ransomnote has or will see this. IT would be a nice thing to post at the beginning of the thread so people can be referred back to it.

[TXBubba]

Looks like Roseanne now has a show on Jon Voight’s new Jewish Television Network. No idea what that is or where. But interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSWt2sMZpSE

[BiggBob]

New praying medic
We are at war
https://youtu.be/H2YdTfDGlgQ

[Califreak]

[TBall]

Of course the Clinton’s would be number one, but it would be good to see Bill Maher go down if there is any truth to the sick allegations.

[Califreak]

[blu]

Then a few *prideful* among us (as exhibitionists do) toss the thread courtesy request/rules out, just certain that they can “fight back” due to their inflated view of their debate skills. This Always succeeds in gobbling up the dang Thread with endless adolescent arguments, back and forth.

Rita, were you replying to a thread? Have you missed the requests to include at least a part of the post that you are replying to in your post? Did you really mean to sound so condescending?