Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally

Re: And they are refusing to “confirm her presence”. When does that ever happen? And what possible reason (aside from her absence) would there be to NOT confirm it?

><

Who is “they”. There was a post somewhere above about this. Sounded to me like “they” could not confirm her presence next Tuesday, which makes sense, because it is in the future.

“The Supreme Court returns from a four-week recess on Tuesday, and it is unclear whether Ginsburg will be on the bench.”

and..

“Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is participating in a private conference with other justices Friday after missing several high-court meetings and dates for health reasons.

Ginsburg is working from her chambers Friday, according to a court spokesperson, and will participate in the in-person closed-door conference Friday morning.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-ginsburg-makes-first-visit-to-supreme-court-since-lung-cancer-surgery


1,953 posted on 02/15/2019 9:58:06 AM PST by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1939 | View Replies ]


To: deks

So.

No public appearances for RBG.

They’re either still perfecting the body double.

OR she looks really really really really bad...


1,956 posted on 02/15/2019 10:00:50 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: deks

Two things need to happen here. One we need an anon to get to the SC and stake it out. Number two we need to find out why there was an ad for a RBG look a like in the WaPo.


1,958 posted on 02/15/2019 10:07:25 AM PST by defconw (WWG1WGA! MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: bagster; Cletus.D.Yokel; ransomnote
The OIG did not, and does not, have the security clearances to view Hillary's email. The House Committee(s) did not, and do not have security clearances to view Hillary's email.

This begs several questions:
Who, by name, HAVE the clearances to view Hillary's email?
Who, by name, have viewed Hillary's email?
Were these incidental views, such as Huma, Carlos Danger, NYPD detectives, WikiLeaks, Seth Rich, Cheryl Mills, Sid Viscous, Donna Brazile, IT technicians?

Who will ask, on the record?

1,959 posted on 02/15/2019 10:07:30 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: Anybody

updated just before Noon today...

“Ginsburg, 85, participated in a private conference with her colleagues as they considered which cases to accept for review or reject, said court spokeswoman Kathleen Arberg.”


1,974 posted on 02/15/2019 10:25:14 AM PST by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: deks; JoSixChip; hillarynot; Jane Long; BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Black Agnes; djstex; ...
I have wondered since GHWB’s funeral if that wasn't what was passed around was the notice that RBG was on her death bed and will die soon...

Who says she has or hasn't, you can't trust the media, they have been taken over by the Nazis and so has the Senate and House of Representatives...

I haven't heard Our President say anything about it nor have I heard a media Nazi as the question for Our President to answer...so this leaves me to feel that by now she is dead, buried and Our President is bidding his time...he NEVER shows his hand until HE is ready...

2,026 posted on 02/15/2019 11:42:10 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson