You keep changing the requirements to fit your narrative. You even went as low as trying to prove your case using child soldiers from the Sudan and some 12 year old boy using a bat. Neither scenario applies here.
The requirements are still the same, since a couple days ago
No evidence of 11 year old girls beating 6’5 250lb man to death
He escalated to excessive force, that is why HE was arrested, the 11 year old girl was not arrested. Why is that?
Actually, my narrative is rock-solid and demonstrated by my examples. In a single sentence, my narrative is that even children of 11 and 12 years of age can (and do) kill. This observation is pertinent in this situation.
He escalated to excessive force, that is why HE was arrested, the 11 year old girl was not arrested. Why is that?
I agree he escalated too far, but the gang of girls, particularly the primary aggressor, should face justice for provoking the entire violent encounter. The reason she was not arrested is that children are often (and erroneously, to my mind) given passes for behaviors an adult would be arrested for. When it comes to provoking violent confrontation, this is doubly-true.
His overreaction conceded, I still say she tried to grab the bull and instead got the horns.