The point is that no matter who won the GOP nomination, the rats were going forward with their coup.
“Not big on sarcasm are you. Q said Ted Cruz was also surveilled. He colluded with Russia, just like Trump. If Trump colluded, Cruz colluded.
The point is that no matter who won the GOP nomination, the rats were going forward with their coup.”
I am big on sarcasm and way after I posted that it dawned on me what the intent was. Perhaps it could have been conveyed in a way that was slightly more obvious as to the pun. I noticed I wasn’t the only one who mistook the comment. But I was way behind the thread and had to try and piece together what transpired that day.
That is obvious that anyone but the chosen opponent (Jeb or Rubio?) would have been under the same criticism. Certainly anyone audacious enough to beat HRC.
Q did not say anything about actual Cruz collusion.
Assumptions are that the cia would have come after Cruz with false narratives, if he had won the nomination, as hard as they smeared Trump and tried to frame him.
Q dropped names of officials who were “illegally surveiled”, indicating the license given to Brennan & Klapper to illegally snoop, at will, on anyone, anywhere.
Cruz was one of three named, but Q said many others were victims of illegal CIA surveillance.