All that we need to know
>>All that we need to know
I’d more say simplistic and non-analytical. We’ve been asked to think and to research. Never to blindly accept. We do that and that is the essence of Q, to me. Q has built a base of questioning researchers, not blind followers. What he’s created is the opposite of the low information voters.
I think Sundance starts with some different assumptions than we do, which leads him to different conclusions. But my respect for Sundance’s analytical abilities stays great, even when I disagree with him.