Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TEXOKIE

Yeah but then Q had to go ahead and confirm “it”, i.e. that which must not be named.


1,717 posted on 12/10/2018 1:16:11 PM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies ]


To: ichabod1; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; ...

Q Anon: 12/06/18 Trust Trump’s Plan
12/10/2018, 3:16:11 PM · 1,717 of 1,808
ichabod1 to TEXOKIE
Yeah but then Q had to go ahead and confirm “it”, i.e. that which must not be named.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

You make an interesting point.... it surely does seem to be a confirmation from Q... but at the time, or a bit later, I seem to recall a discussion in which the case was made that it seemed more like a hint; as a possibility, rather than an outright confirmation.

I think some were making a case that the “it” in question could be based on spiritual interpretation, rather than physical. We are NOT alone, if one has the belief and understanding that the Universe is populated with Our God and His angels and all other aspects of His marvelous creation.

I also seem to have the clang of a distant memory of Q chastising an anon for concluding that that drop was a “proof” of “it.” However, I have been unable to find that drop, so have no way to support this assertion.

Nevertheless, I think that the bottom line is that the drop CAN be viewed both ways. (And I suspect each of us has a preference as to how that drop should be viewed!) But as you say, the specific “it” must not be named on open forum!

BTW, the main drop in question is 2222 from Sept 19 2018.


1,863 posted on 12/10/2018 6:17:32 PM PST by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1717 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson