Historically, it's teachers who've become the most knowledgeable about a subject, through teaching it, not by directing others to information so that they may learn on their own, though that too is a very important part of the process.
Below is an example of an instance where I practiced what I'm preaching:
Q Anon: 12/01/18 Trust Trump's Plan
12/2/2018, 6:34:31 PM · 186 of 2,082<
amorphous to xxxxxxxxxx
...what is the point of talking in code like some sort of middle school kid with a decoder ring?
It's because of whatever position in our government Q holds, a position some say requires Q level clearance, he/she/they are unable to reveal information which many at best will construed as sensitive/classified and illegal to reveal.
This is why Q MUST present things the public needs to know as a question, open source leads, & etc.
Apologies for the shortness of my fellow QFers. It's a fine line between answering a question, which is a tactic trolls use to waste our time, or being snarky, which dissuades trolls, but also turns away those who are honestly looking to learn more about Q.
For more info:
Q - The Plan To Save The World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cYZ8dUgPuU
I like to think I presented things in a different light which maybe was easier for the individual to understand. I also like to think others may happen upon my minor post and to learn why Q comms are the way they are.
The person was either satisfied with my answer, or left, because they never responded back. It allowed me to flesh out my thoughts and future responses, concerning the subject, as well.
It DOES NOT MATTER how accurate, factual, solid, proven, logical your information is--they will still refuse to accept it--out of habit, if nothing else.
I like to think I presented things in a different light which maybe was easier for the individual to understand. I also like to think others may happen upon my minor post and to learn why Q comms are the way they are.
The person was either satisfied with my answer, or left, because they never responded back. It allowed me to flesh out my thoughts and future responses, concerning the subject, as well.
_______________________________________
This same effort at illustrative response can be typed into a FAQ page once, instead of typed over and over every time it is requested. Aside from a concise answer, many other FReeQs (prior) posted answers can be linked so that a person could browse different styles and aspects of answers.
13 months of experience on this thread has shown that frequently the same question is asked over and over by the same person regardless of how many well intentioned FReeQs have already done an excellent job of explaining the answer. This leads to significant thread disruption.
There’s no need for all thread participants to repeatedly read through new explanations to old questions posed by well-intended individuals. Unfortunately, too many genuinely disruptive trolls intersperse insults with their defense that they were “just asking a question” for me to see the value in engaging when prior responses on FR, Twitter, Youtube etc. exist.