Replies

That is a good article. I was drawn to this paragraph in regards to people who are opposed to Q, esp. trolls posting here. MILLIONS of people have been woken. Do they think that would have occurred without Q? It surely wouldn't have happened with the tiny segment of the population that frequents this site.

This is controversial, but in my opinion, the Q phenomenon is likely the work of Trump's spooks. Whatever you may think of it, to me it's one of the most spectacular psyops campaigns ever conducted. With Q, millions of people are far more aware of the details of SpyGate than would have been the case, without it.

Q is also a useful vehicle for Trump's master spooks to run disinformation and deception narratives, to confuse and distract Trump's enemies, who no doubt read and analyze the Q posts closely.

Much like Trump's tweets, Q has had a devastating effect, drawing millions of people away from the Fake News, the main artery Obama & Clinton use to spread propaganda and lies. If Q is just a larp, he/she is an absolute genius.

I doubt Q is a larp.

Again, the Obama/Clinton crew have no answer to these tactics.

I doubt Q is a larp.

Myself included. The following is in noway directed at you, UPSDriver. It's just my take on those !@#$%^&*, non-believing, Q trolls. :D

Certainly FR has its share of DS trolls, as most social media sites do. But IMO, the majority of so-called 'trolls' on FR are looking to debate, whether for fun or actually looking learn if the Q phenomenon is a good thing or a bad thing.

If one has the time, simply explain, as best you can, what you know in a respectful manner. Doing this enlightens other readers as well, and is far more effective than deriding someone, even a troll, for asking what may seem a staged question to those knowledgeable of Q.

If obviously a provocation, or you don't have the time/patience at the time, simply ignore them and go do something else.

Some, especially those who keep coming back, have apparently had their egos bruised/offended, and desperate for revenge.

Arguing/debating these folks is a total waste of time. They're not changing their mind, no matter what you say, you're just helping to spawn derision which leads to division, which is exactly where the DS wants us - divided.

This is a good place to mention a technique to divide a group is placing agent provocateurs (if you will) on both sides to create and nurture division.

Recall good advice from Q:

Together we are strong.

They want us divided.

WWG1WGA