Replies

“Well...I respectfully submit that you are stuck on opinion...”

I stated facts and if you don’t like it, then the word “opinion” doesn’t mean what you think it means.

I admired Jeff Sessions. Still do but he couldn’t get things done and was a liability to the President.

As a result of Sessions being handcuffed, whether by choice or by circumstance is immaterial to the fact that nothing happened to the massive criminality against this Republic prior to the elections and now the Republicans have lost the house.

If you want to stay in your fantasy world, please do so but please stop encouraging others to join in and watch a “game” movie.

We need Americans to get in the fight and take action, not sit on their asses reading 4Chan LARPers.

It’s cost this country plenty already.

I didn't see 'facts'. I saw your opinion regarding an article about admitted LARPS wanting to take down Q. Q has shown his value countless times, but you chose to believe known LARPS over irrefutable proofs that Q has access to things a common roleplay game wouldn't have. Opinion s aren't facts. Facts are evidence, substance. So what's your point then about Q being supportive of Sessions being a good guy if you also respect him? Q said to trust Sessions, but that's somehow a problem for you. Nobody is disputing Sessions inferior productivity levels in certain areas, only that he wasn't a black hat. We can assume Q's intended meaning, but unless he himself explains HIS intended meaning, then we have to put that comment into the stack of unknown meanings until such time as the authors intention is revealed. We don't have the information available to know what transpired between Sessions, other department personnel, and Witaker, his replacement, do we? Whether or not I like what you present as facts is irrelevant to whether or not you facts hold any evidentiary weight. What do you have to support your points? THAT's what matters. I agree completely that folks need to get they're noses out of their phones with regard to internet forums, and put action into their lives, but isn't that what Q has been encouraging, also? Learn AND act. Euphamisms = movies. Some folks don't work well with those type of expressed terms. But if it encourages people to understand the phases needed to progress, and become an acting part in this bigger than life drama, then what's the problem? Where is the dispute? The message I am getting is that either you don't grasp what's going on, or you are doing an excellent job of presenting those areas in which a lot of people struggle with in understanding this Q thing 😅.