Don't the newbies in most orgs start out cleaning the toilets? LOLOL. Fits, to me.
As usual I like the way you think Jocko.
A few days ago there was a bit of discussion about qualifications needed to be allowed to vote. This communist hyphenated half-wit who was voted in by an electorate only wanting gubmint handouts would not have passed my elementry school social studies test on the make-up of our federal government. Before she's seated in the House shouldn't she be required to pass a test knowing the branches of govt?
No, of course not. Fool that I am thinking someone in Congress should be an intelligent, informed person. Has anyone else here speculated on what the Founding Fathers would think of this stupid woman?
Uhhhhhhh, probably, the Founding Fathers would have thought that almost all women were too uninformed, too uneducated, too driven by emotions and/or too thick-headed to serve in either House of the Federal government. Occasional Cortex seems bent on proving them right about at least one woman.
After watching Ocasio-Cortez playing to the Propaganda Ministry (plus observing their almost lock step reaction), I've come from WTF to approximately the same reaction as:
Deceivers Leading Many Astray… They’re Here!
By Dave Merrick
https://canadafreepress.com/article/deceivers-leading-many-astray...-theyre-here
After growing up around Chicago, I guess I've just got one tactical response to 'rats of any description: Observe, identify and eliminate/remove from positions of authority.
(...thought I'd clarify that "eliminate" a bit so as not to melt any snowflakes in attendance)
“Has anyone else here speculated on what the Founding Fathers would think of this stupid woman? “
It is racist, sexist, and bigoted to impugn a young woman who is only trying to learn. . .