It struck me reading the new thread . . . that someone virtually hell-bent on irrationally castigating Q and Q followers—has also instructed some to NOT post to them under threat of screaming to Big Daddy.
Seems to me that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
If such a person insists on not being bothered by unpleasant-to-her posts, then let her quit bothering the Q threads with unwelcome posts.
Otherwise, her hypocrisy screams rather loudly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Good points, JockoManning -
but I would want a ruling from Mother of Dragons before advocating any policy actions on the subject as you describe!
At this point, we think we know who some of the disruptors are, and current policy as I understand it, is to not engage or to refer them in a reasonable manner to wonderful links from our Thread Header Grid.
At this point, we think we know who some of the disruptors are, and current policy as I understand it, is to not engage or to refer them in a reasonable manner to wonderful links from our Thread Header Grid.
_____________________________________________
I believe our thread participants engaged disrupters last week and upon analysis, discovered that it’s a waste of time. Disrupters ask questions as a means of getting a foot in the door, they don’t want and won’t accept answers to the questions they ask, and are here to soak up time and attention. Ultimately, many play the victim card.
Providing unknown seekers with links or pointing them to the table at the top of the thread can be helpful. Engaging with disrupters has not proven to be useful.