To: grey_whiskers
"ransomnote is the curator of the thread, Sherlock. And bbagster gives summaries of Q drops + some highlights of interpretation on the thread."
Do these interpretations include arbitrary insults? There are a few posters on this board who appear to me as fraudulent disruptor's rather than serious debaters. I have come to the conclusion that THEY are the plan and I don't trust them. If Q is a fraud, then those pushing him/it are frauds as well and so far we have absolutely nothing to show for what has been inferred/promised.
To: Uncle Sham
Your post is absurd as the defenders of Siegfried and Roy’s tiger.
1,545 posted on
11/13/2018 8:29:42 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Uncle Sham; grey_whiskers; bagster; ransomnote
To: Uncle Sham; grey_whiskers; bagster; ransomnote
To: Uncle Sham; grey_whiskers; bagster; ransomnote
To: grey_whiskers; bagster
Check it out dude!
#gofundme/FReeQs/bagster
1,598 posted on
11/13/2018 9:51:43 AM PST by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: Uncle Sham
Do these interpretations include arbitrary insults? 
1,682 posted on
11/13/2018 11:48:26 AM PST by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
