I tend to agree, but that does nothing to take away from the "Scalia [187]" theory.
And Q pretty much confirms it. Pedophelia notwithstanding.
Bagster
> “Q has told us that Scalia was murdered. I believe him. Scalia’s murder was made to look like a “good and decent man died in his sleep”.”
When the rumors started floating around that Justice Scalia was murdered (outside of Q), there followed on the heels of the rumor, there followed more rumors that he’d been off’d by one of his ‘victims’ of his pedophilia, that the ranch where he had gone was a ranch where pedophiles could do their dirty deeds with young boys.
I never believed the rumor of Scalia’s perversion. I saw it as a smear attempt to counteract an awakening to his murder.
I had followed backstory news of certain individuals who had been targeted, then picked up on child porn charges in contexts where their life history had never before revealed child porn obsessions. I began to see a pattern and started to think if there was a tactic to plant evidence on a target’s computer that would enable dirty operatives to take out a target for good.
Then I saw confirmation posted by others that indeed one tactic of renegade operatives is to plant false evidence on computers. I read and heard “It’s what they do”.
So when I see such items in stories, I don’t immediately discount or believe it, I sit on the fence pondering its veracity.
So when the rumors started floating about Scalia’s ‘pedophilia’, I put it close to the same mental bin as “JFK Jr. faked his own death”.
I tend to agree, but that does nothing to take away from the "Scalia [187]" theory.
And Q pretty much confirms it. Pedophelia notwithstanding.
Bagster