Posted on 09/11/2018 10:26:51 AM PDT by blueunicorn6
Does anyone know why Hillary and Obama attacked Libya?
Anyone?
They have successfully avoided answering that question for several years now.
We all focus on the fight at Benghazi, but what caused that fight?
The initial reports from Benghazi mentioned that Ambassador Stevens had been sodomized.
Why would they do that to him?
The Democrats tried to say that Ambassador Stevens was a homosexual, but that was proven false.
Why would anyone lie about that?
Because Hillary and Obama paid thugs to sodomize Libya’s leader, Qadaffi, with a bayonet.
The fight at Benghazi was to draw the world’s attention to the criminal behavior of Hillary and Obama in Libya.
Hillary and Obama attacked Libya to steal that country’s wealth.
That is why we were struck at Benghazi.
Why didn’t they keep on attacking us?
Where do you think the $6,000,000,000 that Hillary “lost” went to?
It went to keep people quiet about the criminal actions of Hillary and Obama.
Why do you think an entire warehouse of US military equipment was shipped to Libya and left unguarded so that it could be “stolen”?
It was part of the payment to keep quiet the criminal actions of Hillary and Obama.
Why did Hillary and Obama, two of the biggest loudmouths ever, suddenly go quiet and hide after the fight at Benghazi?
Because they were terrified that their criminal actions in Libya were about to be uncovered.
Well, we are six years down the road and Hillary and Obama are millionaires.
Their Democrat allies in government and the press have successfully kept them out of prison.
The rest of the world thinks that all Americans are like Hillary and Obama.
They think we are all murdering criminals.
That is the legacy of Hillary and Obama.
“We came. We saw. He died. (Cackle, cackle, cackle).”
Every day that Hillary and Obama aren’t sitting behind bars is another blot on the US and a crime against humanity.
>>why destroy Libya?
Probably a combination of these factors and others...
(1) they wanted Quadaffi’s gold for themselves
(2) Quadaffi was one of several countries trying to undermine the dollar by creating a gold-based currency for international purchases such as oil. Syria was another one involved in the same effort.
(3) the Deep State likes to create sh*thole regions in the world by arming “rebels”, which then take over pockets of countries where the deep state is then free to set up its own safe base stations, free of oversight.
(4) a year after murdering Quadaffi, our ops there became an embarrassment to HRC due to their arms sales in the region, and she wanted them wiped out too, hence Benghazi.
The first thing Obama did overseas after his first election:
He went to Egypt and gave a prominent televised speech in which he essentially announced he was OK with the Muslim Brotherhood and there was this whole new Period of American Understanding of Islam that would be coming in. There were also heavy rumors that Obama would be negotiating somehow behind the scenes for release of The Blind Shiek, imprisoned in SuperMax for the first WTC bombing.
How to repatriate him w/o causing a yuge American uproar..? How to turn lemons into lemonade..?
They’d SWAP The Blind Shiek for some important American:
Hey, how about a freakin’ AMBASSADOR..? Problem was no muzzie had ever kidnapped one before:
They hatched a plan: They’d GET one kidnapped..!
He (or she) wouldn’t even have to be witting to the scheme..! It’d be like a naked chick jumping out of an oversized cake —the guy would be genuinely surprised, no acting needed:
They’d send this hypothetical Ambassador to somewhere pretty risky, then provide only token security. Then Sidney Blumenthal —who was already in charge of setting up Hillary’s ‘Pop-up CIA’— would prearrange with some really scummy local friends already looting the country to get him kidnapped:
“HOW IN HELL DID THE M.B. *KNOW* WHEN AND WHERE CHRIS STEVENS WOULD BE..?!”
Problem is people always frame that question rhetorically; they should be taking the extra step of ANSWERING their own really great question:
CUZ THEY TOLD THE M.B. WHERE HE’D BE AND WHEN. Yeah, they told them. The attack would be as spontaneous as high mass at St. Anthony’s.
When the attackers finally started pulling the job, the local hire “defenders” physically OPENED the gates and the attackers told them, “Dr. Morsi SENT us”.
I’d say that’s a pretty good clue, eh..?
Why when they found the dazed, sooty Stevens did they boisterously shout Allah Akbar..? Because they were counting their money, more or less, and a little premature, as it turned out.
It looked so bad —hmmmm, they don’t seem much like rescuers— that Hillary very high-handedly jumped in, “America praises and thank the *RESCUERS* of Chris Stevens..!!! Though as it turned out they were too late...”
It was vintage Hillary damage control, skills well-honed from Bimbo Eruptions. I really have to admire her chutzpah and calm, as they airplane risked nosing into rocky public perceptions terrain.
And after the snatch had taken place, cool Obama, who the public knew had once attended a madrassah and could speak Indonesian, would use his worldly savoire-faire to negotiate the innovative swap:
They’d get great visuals of Stevens triumphantly walking down the airplane steps at Andrews AFB, to the cheering throngs.
It would be like Reagan’s Iran Hostages return, but ten times more.
AND RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION..!!!!
The election was then widely forecast to be a squeeker, and this innovative “under the radar” plan would put him over the top by a whisker, and just in time.
BENGHAZI WAS ABOUT A RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN.
Any Freeper - what was the first thing that Obama's state Dept required the Rebels to create before they recognised them as the new state?
I forgot:
Why did the “rescuers” take Stevens to a hospital locally famous for being controlled by Al Qaeda..?
Cuz the rescuers were NOT rescuers, they were KIDNAPPERS.
Libya was deliberately brought down because they were about to issue gold backed national currency that could have further destabilized western dominance of African countries.
great points!
+100 answer.
The attack by Hillary, Obama and Soros had nothing to do with saving helpless people in Libya.
Hillary had her own spy agencies in Libya.
Why?
She was the US Secretary of State.
She had access to the largest spy system in the world.
Yet, she creates her own spy network in Libya.
Why?
Because she couldn’t ask the US intelligence agencies to gather info on what she was really interested in.
Where was Libya’s gold and how could she get it?
The Saudis have had us on a leash since 1973. The Saudis had a bone to pick with Qaddafi just like Saddam Hussein. Now that we’re poised to become the world’s largest oil exporter, the leash has been slipped. The Saudis are no longer the masters of the US.
With the election weeks away a plot was hatched that allowed members of the MB acting as agents of HA and VJ and BO to stage a phony kidnapping of Stevens. Then week only a couple weeks to go Obama would get Stevens released, thus insure his election victory. The SEAL team prevented that.
Why did the CIA higher ups get their local guy to tell the Benghazi defenders to STAND DOWN..?
Because they were WITTING to the unfolding plan, understood the “bigger picture” of WHY Stevens was supposed to fall into “enemy” hands, they saw the full intel mosaic, understood the role of Chris Stevens.
The really scary thing is there are elements inside the CIA so globalist, so reckless and blase about the level of “engagement” they’re using that they might not even any longer regard the enemy AS the enemy at all.
They are utterly unlike us, in their basic views.
That might happen, with a Muslim convert DCI and his very many lackeys.
It’s the kind of crowd that, years later, would attempt a coup against an elected US President.
Yep. And currency speculation.
There were plenty of other nations involved in attacking Libya.
I am an American.
I am concerned with how MY elected officials behaved.
Hillary, Obama and Soros have stalled the investigation and prosecution of their criminal actions in Libya for over six years.
The pretext was “stop violence” in Libya, but we now know almost for certain that the violence was a red flag operation by similar to the Gleiwitz Incident that Hitler staged to provide pretext for invading Poland . The foreign Jihadi provocateurs who were manufacturing the violence were part of the Obama Arab Spring and were allied Obma, Clinton, Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood Jihadi and the Qatar/Saudi group.
The goals of the operation was to overthrow Gaddafi's to take control of Libya and it's oil fields by the same Arab Spring Muslim Brotherhood ISIS Jihadi that took over Egytp and were fighting to out Assad and take over Syria , steal Gaddafi's estimated TWO TRILLION Dollar financial empire, to use captured Libyan weaponry Gaddafi's massive stockpile to supply Jihadi around the world (especially to provide weapons not tied to the State and non state players conspiring to overthrow Assad in Syria), and finally to use Libya as a conduit for the planned “refugee”invasion of Europe by North African, Southern African and Afghan Jihadi that took place a few years after Gaddafi's was overthrown
They had Stevens.
Why did they give his body back?
FReepers are amazing.
Took only two posts.
5.56mm
A Central Bank that joined BIS
Amen !
>$$$$$$$$$—Yes!<
Libya was about to issue gold backed money. The international banksters couldn’t allow that. The banksters bought Hillary and Obama long before they hit the heights of national political office.
Money, like oil, starts brutal wars.
The reason Hillary and Obama went to war against Libya is because the US had absolutely no national security interest in the fight and no benefit would accrue to the US whether we won or lost.It’s called bizarro logic, a natural trait of great Democrat thinkers.Once they stop thinking about identity politics their cerebral circuitry goes haywire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.