Replies

Food for thought. I'm not recalling "Q spent a lot of time a couple months ago walking us through how the CIA was in charge of the media talking points," but Mockingbird was clearly a CIA operation, and Q made many references to Mockingbird.

I also wonder if Media Object Server is a mundane technical content/formating protocol, not a distribution protocol.

Anonymous 08/14/18 (Tue) 20:07:55 76544b (1) No.2602856
>>2602737

Anonymous 08/14/18 (Tue) 20:02:28 36eb35 (4) No.2602737
>>2602646
If Media Object Server is supposed to be MOS, then it stands to reason that there should be proof that a Media Object Server somehow has control over the US Politicians side of the equation.. so where's the proof?

I have to agree with this. Was leaning Media Object Server first, but that would really have the politicans following the same 4am talking points (which is true to some respect, doesn't make sense).
The part that is blowing my mind is that Q spent a lot of time a couple months ago walking us through how the CIA was in charge of the media talking points, but this graph goes MOS-> Media instead of MOS->CIA->Media or MOS/CIA -> Media.
I would have expected the CIA to be in the flow. Is there another meaning in this that the CIA is dealt with time to move on to the other intelligence orgs WW?

Good advice from an anon ...

Rule of the internet: almost everything you see is FAKE.

Re: the Qanon post #1871 diagram

I think it must be

C_I -> MOS -> MSM

(?)