https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/08/10/now-they-all-lose-newq-qanon-greatawakening/
QUOTE
The Watergate break-in was strictly based on one thing – the pedophile records that were being kept at the Democratic National Headquarters.
– Det. James Rothstein, NYPD, Retired
Pedogate reached the public via social media. YouTube featured interviews with credible witnesses who testified to the existence of an international child sex trafficking operation involving US politicians and the CIA. That was when I noticed retired NYPD Detective James Rothstein. The Pedogate ring, he explained, was the same network he investigated for 35 years. Rothstein observed, the perpetrators were doing everything in their power to shut the Pedogate story down. He predicted the perpetrators would successfully bury it, like every other time their network was almost exposed.
Rothstein explained that the NYPD was no ordinary state police force, but a leading investigative agency with national and international offices. Back in 1966, Rothstein became the first police detective assigned to investigate the prostitution industry. He soon discovered the underground sexual blackmail operation that compromised politicians with child prostitutes. ‘Human Compromise’ is the term he uses for this honey-trap process. Rothstein and his colleagues found that up to 70 percent of top US government leaders had been compromised. The CIA conducted the human compromise operation, while the FBI’s task was to cover it up.
…
In 1972, Rothstein arrested one of the five Watergate burglars, CIA operative Frank Sturgis. During a subsequent two-hour interrogation, he discovered the truth about Watergate. The burglars sought something they nicknamed “The Book” which listed the Democrat and Republican politicians who accessed child prostitutes, their sexual proclivities, the amounts they paid to rape kids, and such.
What if Hillary was actually trying to protect Nixon, in order to keep the whole house of cards from falling down?
Now, I know the above linked article is going to be very hard for many to process, let alone believe, but I’m not going to go in to the whole Fiona Barnett stuff today. Believe me; that needs a whole article unto itself – which is what I’ve been attempting to write for some time – albeit, I need more evidence supporting some of her assertions before I publish anything along those lines.
I mean, doing so would be attacking Billy Graham – a man who’s not even around to defend himself any more. That’s what publishing such an article would mean.
I don’t take that lightly, so I’ve held off. But I will say… I don’t like what I’ve been seeing and reading so far.
END QUOTE
That's the first time I'd heard of that motivation for the Watergate break-in.
Yep. That’s a new one on me.