From truthluva’s link:
https://www.truthorfiction.com/clinton-watergate/
“In an interview on the Neal Boortz Show in 2008, Jerry Zeifman altered his claim about Hillary’s termination from the Watergate investigation:
“Well, let me put it this way: I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — were no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not — recommend her for any further positions.”
I think he had to change his initial stated reason for firing her due to legality. If he states she was fired for lying and unethical behavior, he could be sued and forced to prove her lies and behavior in court ($$$). That’s why many employers will not provide information about why they fired someone.
He says he didn’t have the power to fire her but I wonder if he “worked with” someone to get her fired, and that person is covering themselves legally because they don’t personally have the direct knowledge of her behavior as he does. So there’s now a generic suggestion she was no longer needed.
Just my 2 pesos.
PS: Interesting how her reputation (Watergate and onward) rarely ever slowed her down politically. No wonder she believes she’s invincible.
I agree we as managers have to be careful how we let people go...preventing law suits etc. and thus the reply when asked: “ Why did you fire them “...we are not allowed to give out anything other than: “ They started on this date and ended on this date “ or “ we downsized “...
I wonder at that time in Smelly hag's career if she hadn't learn yet how to ‘kill’ her subjects...like for example the guy that raped the young girl she giggled about...compared to Qaddafi when she said: “We came, We saw, he died”...
Sorry state of affairs when you know all the ‘accidents’ and ‘suicides’ were done on Smelly’s orders...
Just a different train of thought...
Very interesting. Thanks for the ping.