Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

could there be a video of HRC saying
“Keep them starved”
“Keep them blind”
“Keep them stupid”
???? that will soon be revealed?


339 posted on 08/06/2018 6:38:17 AM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: bitt

I don’t know. I think it’s her cruelty to the core talking, but her crimes are so countless and extreme, I suspect they will focus on content in indictments w/o going into what kinds of her foul utterings they intercepted and how they intercepted them. Court of law now, I think. Trump probably wants to remind the public how “due process” and the government were SUPPOSED to work and that seems to hinge on her crimes in Uranium 1, the Weiner laptop etc. (investigations). I do hope that the world knows of the content in that drop I posted, but it is beyond cruel and likely to cause wounds to bleed. So maybe that is for much later?


343 posted on 08/06/2018 6:47:06 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; eyeamok

Thanks, eyemok!

!!!!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3676709/posts?page=6#6

After Twitter was caught last month “shadow-banning” Republicans, while giving Democrats unrestricted voice, the social-media giant insisted it has no political agenda

ENFORCE OUR 100 Yr Old ANTI TRUST LAWS!!!

https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws

The Sherman Act outlaws “every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade,” and any “monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize.” Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. For instance, in some sense, an agreement between two individuals to form a partnership restrains trade, but may not do so unreasonably, and thus may be lawful under the antitrust laws. On the other hand, certain acts are considered so harmful to competition that they are almost always illegal. These include plain arrangements among competing individuals or businesses to fix prices, divide markets, or rig bids. These acts are “per se” violations of the Sherman Act; in other words, no defense or justification is allowed.

The penalties for violating the Sherman Act can be severe. Although most enforcement actions are civil, the Sherman Act is also a criminal law, and individuals and businesses that violate it may be prosecuted by the Department of Justice. Criminal prosecutions are typically limited to intentional and clear violations such as when competitors fix prices or rig bids. The Sherman Act imposes criminal penalties of up to $100 million for a corporation and $1 million for an individual, along with up to 10 years in prison. Under federal law, the maximum fine may be increased to twice the amount the conspirators gained from the illegal acts or twice the money lost by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is over $100 million.
6 posted on 8/5/2018, 12:39:39 PM by eyeamok


358 posted on 08/06/2018 7:16:33 AM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: ExTexasRedhead; All

new hat to buy to make Dems heads explode -

caution to pajama boys/girls- it has the S_itHole word on it..

https://i.etsystatic.com/14749799/r/il/2b32be/1407150746/il_570xN.1407150746_a81a.jpg


361 posted on 08/06/2018 7:23:36 AM PDT by bitt (We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson