That sounds like... an astonishingly good idea.
Posted on 07/05/2018 6:54:21 PM PDT by Simon Green
Well, that’s just raciss. Or unfair to women and the puszy hat wearing dingaling crowd. Or something.
I thought 500cc breast implants were his toughest test.
They had Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell hold hands and jump over a line of football players with linked arms to reach a full buffet table.
Gravity pulled them down onto the players and they tumbled against the table, spraying food and drink all over the assembled photographers.
Einstein was right.
Isn’t science fun?
and yet global warming is settled science
when it’s not done this way, it’s not science.
The global warming crowd better not hear of this blasphemy.
This pulsar is 4,200 light-years away, and they can measure its position to within a few hundred meters???
I recently purchased a neodynum, however you spell it, magnet.
It is astonishing how something like that can exert such a force and continue to do so. It has such a strong attraction that it is difficult to pull off my car’s trunk, and that is with a rope attached to it.
Whatta bout Finestein’s Theory of her own Gravitas?
I think they’re speaking of its position relative to the other stellar remnants in the system.
Except globull warming "science." Whether it's predictions are right or wrong it's still settled.
??!!!
That sounds like... an astonishingly good idea.
Gravity researchers love to make outlandish claims they’ll never be called on for by grant funders.
He was way over rated. His joke that “time goes backwards at 186,000 miles per second” is a knee slapping joke. I really think he was just a blow hard with chutzpah and crazy hair.
> Whether it’s [Global Warming’s] predictions are right or wrong it’s still settled. <
And it’s even worse than that. No one is permitted to question this “settled science”. Try it, and your lectures will be picketed. You will receive death threats. Your career will be ruined.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Seems to me the author is a bit confused between general relativity and Newton's laws of mechanics.
> He [Einstein] was way over rated. <
Not really. He was just not right about everything. His Theory of Special Relativity (1905) is breathtaking in its beauty and its boldness. And that theory has passed every test that has been thrown at it.
The same goes for his dual nature (wave and particle) theory of light.
On the other hand, Einstein never quite accepted Quantum Mechanics. And that might be because he had no hand in it.
So over-rated? No. Egotistical and sometimes stubborn? You bet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.