[Okeydoker]

If you actually read the letter appointing huber you will see that he was given 3duties. None involved investigating or prosecuting anyone. He was charged with doing an internal review of resources. And he was to make recommendations to sessions. That is NOT the way a US Atty operates.

And, noteworthy, jonathan Turley has NEVER made the mistake of repeating his mistaken notion that Huber is authorized to prosecute anyone. He obviously was straightened out by someone after making his inaccurate statement that you quoted.

Dont you believe if sessions were doing anything that Trump would have been told? Is there really anything to be gained by Trump falsely repeatedly publicly claiming that sessions is an ineffective incompetent? Do you really think that scam would fool anyone in the deep state.

Remember the old adage, “if it seems too good to be true, it probably is”.

[edzo4]

Trump is the victim in the case, when does the prosecutor discuss ongoing investigations with the victim of the crime?

PS the letter you speak of is exactly where is says he has a staff of 470 and the ability to convene a grand jury

[JockoManning]

I'm a bit curious--on average, what %% of your conjectures, assumptions, assessments usually pan out to be true or mostly true?

And, what % of the time do you ever admit to the person in your mirror that you were wrong or mostly wrong? . . . And how often would your spouse & kids assert that you were wrong or mostly wrong?