Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet; BenLurkin; Simon Green

The reason the M-3 grease gun lived so long, was that it fit very nicely inside a tank. Its role was that of a ‘crew served weapon’ for when one of the crew dismounted the tank. The M-1, M-14, and M-16 were too long to find a safe storage location inside of a cramped tank compartment. I remember one of our 2LT Forward Observers taking his M-16 inside the tank he used to FO from, after being told NOT to by the CO, and the M-16 ending up as a pretzel.

Other posters have mentioned the slow cyclic rate of the grease gun as a deficiency for being a SMG and I agree. I had a friend who was a LRRP in Vietnam and he swore by the Swedish K SMG he carried on patrols.

I have no comment on which of the new SMGs should be adopted but the Grease Gun’s day is passed as a general issue SMG.


30 posted on 06/14/2018 7:53:53 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: GreyFriar

The Turret Monster has eaten a lot of M-16s.


31 posted on 06/14/2018 7:58:48 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson