Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chelsea Clinton not happy about being compared to Howdy Doody
American Thinker ^ | 6/13/2018 | Monica Showalter

Posted on 06/13/2018 5:56:31 AM PDT by simpson96

Chelsea Clinton seems to have a very thin skin these days.

Some guy on Twitter did a Photoshop portraying her as Howdy Doody (unfortunately for her, the two of them do look alike) and she fired back, in the creepiest passive-aggressive way you can imagine. Here is her sarcastic tweet:

"Thanks to Richard & all the people on @Twitter who’ve compared me to Howdy Doody, I now know a bit about him, including that he stood up to bullies & believed in being kind to animals. I’m always happy to be on the side of allyship & kindness. Thanks again!"

In other words, the comparison bothered her so much she spent a mountain of time going over who Howdy Doody was in a quest to say something, anything, to put the guy down. Other celebs ignore their critics and refuse to dignify their jibes with comments, but Chels was bothered so much by this one she had to say something. Then she played passive-aggressive princess, saying Howdy Doody was a someone who liked animals and didn't believe in bullying, just as she does.

Oh.

At first I thought she was doxxing her critic, (snip) but actually, she was trying to claim that unlike her critic, she and Doody were nice people.

Guess a rich hedge-fund manager's wife has that kind of time. After she got what she was looking for in her Howdy Doody research, she blandly "exposed" her critic as a hypocrite for making her a figure of fun.

Like a public figure such as herself, with a noisy tweet feed, shouldn't ever, ever, be made a figure of fun.

Well, here's what the tweet that triggered her research looked like:

(snip)

Touchy, touchy, touchy...

Guess we know a lot more about Chelsea and her delicate sensitivities now.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: simpson96

I don’t see anything ‘creepy’ or ‘passive-aggressive’ about her Tweet. I’m no fan on Chelsea, but this article is inane.


81 posted on 06/13/2018 12:34:10 PM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

If the face fits ....

Or is it more a comment about a puppet who had two soulless parents ?


82 posted on 06/13/2018 5:23:59 PM PDT by elbook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Say the magic woid, the duck comes down, Hillary steals another 100 million dollars. . . .


83 posted on 06/14/2018 4:23:18 AM PDT by Salgak (You're in Strange Hands with Tom Stranger. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Salgak

haha....


84 posted on 06/14/2018 4:53:53 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson