Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/12/2018 | FReeper, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[No_Doll_i]

Nope That country may very well be lost. Sad!

If anything happens to Tommy there will be MAJOR unrest and probably a great deal bloodshed there.

Maybe POTUS will attempt to intervene dunno

[100American]

Rothshild Island SSW of Argentina is my guess where that would be done

That is right near where the Argentine sub went missing too

[Steven W.]

[Axenolith]

THAAD’s are kinetic kill vehicles. Also, the threat could be as minimal as an upgraded FPV drone, there are several instances of combatants expending multimillion dollar missiles on these types of threats. About the only thing we can actually take to the bank at this point is that there was a land side or near shore launch of a missile there.

We’ll probably have to prove this event looking back from the future...

[pinkpig]

Thanks for the memories. Spent many hours listening, too.

[bitt]

“The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’” according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. “His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant.”

Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, said that such authority gives the president the authority to “classify and declassify at will.”

Even politifact had so admit it was possible...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/

[Kalamata]

Yes, the plane picture. I see the words United, but I can’t see what it is.

[Axenolith]

93 miles altitude, I think that’s an underestimation though.

[Kalamata]

Inside a car, looking at something in front of them, but don’t understand what it is.

[Wneighbor]

that could be too - there are a number of possibilities. USSS doesn’t just pull up to any old plane and “Q” doesn’t just post ... TBD ;)

Asuredly agreed.

That little thought just came beboppin in my head while I was pondering who besides Assange, Snowden, POTUS (or family) they could pick up.

Lightbulb came on that some bad actor with a sealed indictment might need detaining. If someone knew their private jet was being watched they might try catching a commercial flight. But, I tend to think this idea less likely as I think DS has plenty of bugout methods ready.

[100American]

Look at it another way, if the Republic is under threat he declares Marshall law and then the SHTF

Habeas Corpus is suspended and then all the rats will scatter like roaches as at that point we are taking down a treasonous conspiracy and hangings and firing squads come into play. Military tribunals, not sure if you have seen how many military officers have been called back to duty, they would be the onces conducting the trials in that scenario

[Steven W.]

WATCH THE WATER!

@GenFlynn

[bagster]

Weird theory #1:

Okay. I had this weird thought after watching FReeQs talking about Assange and that plane with the USSS.

So Q REPOSTS his IG/RR post immediately after the original with the photo attached. Why does he need to repost? The post and the photo don't seem to have any connection. Or do they?

Q likes word games, puzzles, and codes, right? So in the post he writes, IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. (in ALL CAPS). Q is a fan of "out of darkness light".

Ya with me?

Anyway. MAYBE some of you are right. MAYBE somebody (JA) or some other high value target was actually on that plane. Somebody that might require OFFICIAL protection. Not Blackwater. Not even U.S. Marshalls.

Anyway. That's my crazy connection. Maybe nothing. Maybe something.

Caught up on thread and Q seems down for the night (I hope.)

Papa's got a paper to write. Hahaha. See ya in a few, sportsfans.

Bagster

[100American]

That looks like a Twin Engine, possibly 787 which flying to/from UK to bring Assange back would fit

He is still in UK, correct

Or maybe better stated ...Was

LOL

[bitt]

his last post was April 15 -

thanks to the bitchy biddys who ran him off... “oh, he didn’t take down that fake picture in 5 minutes!” “Oh he’s terrible!!”..

FEH.

[Steven W.]

Be sure to include (see above) General Michael Flynn has just changed his water background pic on Twitter (no new posts, just new graphics!)

[Wingy]

The question is - who is able to drive their car up to an arriving United Airlines plane?

While wearing an ape mask? Check out the passenger...

[bitt]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/ie3SrjLlcUY

attention all WWII flying freaks -

extexasredhead sent me this AMAZING video of an American pilot
flying a Spitfire over Germany UNarmed.. alone...

~~~~~~~~
from your post (initial point. This was a term used in WWII. it referred to the spot a bomber would begin it’s bombing run at. The bombsites of the day required a period of straight and level flying to be adjusted for accurate results.)

[ransomnote]

This thread has now retired. ThankQ to all who made it interesting and to those who kept us company by lurking. :)

Our latest Q thread is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3663027/posts

[Wneighbor]

With the apparent animosity between POTUS and the Brits, and the Brits seeking to arrest JA if he sets foot out of the embassy, how do you conjecture that he got from the Ecuadorian Embassy, through the airport and on the plane?

Not attempting disagreement as I think JA or Snowden are most likely. However, in the past when I have made conjectures on evacuating JA I figured it would need at least a couple people to get him out of the embassy. And I kinda expected a more clandestine manner of removing him from the island.

Though the United flight could have brought him here from a different country after a clandestine effort to remove him from GB.

Just brainstorming. Not sleepy yet and wheels are turning.