Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CJ Wolf
he stuff said was too close to home. The “inside source” asked for verification somehow and Q then verified in a later post to prove he was indeed who Q said Q was.

So you're saying that Q has undeniably verified himself as an "inside source" to members of the Deep State but not in a way that is apparent to us? I don't know how that would make him a "conspiracy no more."

The bad guys absolutely know Q is the real deal. They know the truth of what Q is revealing because they are guilty of it.

Why else would they try so hard to squash him? If he was a larp or a fake conspiracy theory, they wouldn't try so hard. Also, they wouldn't react so violently to what Q is revealing.

It's the common man, the general public, and even Anti-Q activist trolls like 1 inch grope that need convincing.

I want it to be as plain as the beautiful nose on my face.

Q says he just did undeniably revealed himself, but i don't see it with my own eyes. I want to be able to explain it to people. Cboldt may have the right of it. Let me address his comment.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

981 posted on 05/20/2018 8:48:15 PM PDT by bagster (The Bagster Alliance is insidous. The B clique is mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 947 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/998364033811140608

The connection is (I believe) there are many cases like mine — and what they did to try to keep out @realDonaldTrump was so that can of worms wouldn’t be opened. It’s big. Bigger than 2016.

Click on the link ... bigger than you think.


982 posted on 05/20/2018 8:49:48 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
There will never be unequivocal evidence.

Skeptics are fine. As long as they are open minded about events, things work out in a sensible fashion.

Think of it this way, there are people who would criticize (do criticize) Trump for positions, actions (stop tweeting!) ... and things will work out irrespective of the criticism.

Q is in the same boat, but of course with more built-in negativity.

986 posted on 05/20/2018 8:54:17 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

Q has said we have more then we know and it’s all out there and ironically referenced almost every conspirsy in many of the q posts.

Typically, In the beginning after the event there are narratives we watch
And then we are told how to believe what happened according to the narrative.

Anything that deviates intially is questioned by a normal person and questions arises.

Answers are then put forth. Most are real and then perverted into the unbelievable by the ds. falsified additions are added to increase disbelief and then ridiculed. Then the problem of the truth is made to go away. Ds is scared. The conspiracies are in the mirror now, what if up is now down. They need verification that this is really happening. Why do we need to let them know is a good question. Hence the allowed intrusion. And Q let them know it’s real.

I could be wrong. Just my thoughts.


1,008 posted on 05/20/2018 9:20:09 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Tag, you're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

C’mon Baggy!
Q is trying to claim the internet title of “Tippy Top LARPer”.


1,184 posted on 05/21/2018 9:37:37 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson