Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Conserv

It’s a stupid idea, anyway. Primaries should be closed so that party members can choose their nominees.

I’ll go out out on a limb and guess that the Times didn’t have a problem whenever two Democrats wound up being the general election choice, but now they’re all worried about how Democrat voters won’t have a chance to knock off a Republican in a swing district.

They’re not even subtle. They should just call for the banning of the Republican Party. You know, because it harmful — “The Republican Party is known by the state of California to... blah, blah, blah.....”


5 posted on 05/19/2018 11:32:45 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Southside_Chicago_Republican

As I posted earlier, as soon as the Jungle Primary starts denying Democrats a place on the ballot of “important” races, the Democrats will sue (and a judge will agree) that the Jungle Primary effectively takes away the votes of minorities. I believe the same of the so-called state compact end-around the Electoral College. As soon as it denies a Democrat the Presidency, the Democrat-dominated state legislatures will simply annul their states’ participation and award the electoral votes to the Democrat who won their states’ votes. They are playing a “heads I win, tails you lose” game here.


12 posted on 05/19/2018 12:30:20 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson