Wondering what FReeQs think about the supposed wiretap of Cohen’s phone that has now been walked back?
FBI LEGALLY couldn’t listen to Cohen’s calls. But I think it’s possible they did. Now they can’t legally use anything they heard to bring charges. So maybe they’re stuck trying to figure out a legal means by which they can claim to know what they know?
Any keyword caught could cause the msg/conversation to be recorded in toto. If he recalls correctly, the acres of computers were in the USA, AUSTRALIA AND UK.
There was some speculations as to whether 100% of all meant all electricity circuits in every country or just the Western countries. The most experienced personnel thought it was 100% of all circuits in 100% of all countries.
"THEY" (tyrannical globalists) have been managing such comprehensive monitoring in spite of the Constitution a long time. They have not cared about the Constitution a very long time.
Privacy has been extinct a very long time.
Cohen's calls--100% of them have been included in this comprehensive monitoring just as all of our calls have been.
It has been speculated by some and affirmed by others that now, with memory so cheap--they just automatically record everything on everyone. We don't know for sure, about that.
weston wrote:
“Wondering what FReeQs think about the supposed wiretap of Cohen’s phone that has now been walked back?
FBI LEGALLY couldn’t listen to Cohen’s calls. But I think it’s possible they did. Now they can’t legally use anything they heard to bring charges. So maybe they’re stuck trying to figure out a legal means by which they can claim to know what they know?”
The very fact that they are backpedaling shows that they are in a trap of their own making.
But on a larger picture, they’ve shredded attorney client privilege.
And in so doing, have shown to everyone that they don’t care one bit for the rule of law.
Perhaps,fbi found some unexpected info, and now that hey don’t want any of it to be admissible.
Hmmmm