That it were “old news” would mean Iran should have been taken down long ago.
Well if it were old news that they were lying, why did Obama pursue the deal? Why didn’t you publicly say that the Iranians were lying and the deal was worthless?
Weasel.
They keep telling us this is a great treaty. Though its not a treaty, of course.
They keep telling us Iran is fulfilling the requirements of the treaty. But they don’t tell us what the requirements of the treaty are.
Only Iranians are allowed to be inspectors, and no inspections are allowed of military sites by anyone. Oh, and Americans are not allowed to know the details of the inspections.
Which means they can fulfill all the requirements of the agreement and still continue to work toward a nuke. Meanwhile they are sheltered by the non-treaty-treaty, we have agreed to leave them alone for the duration, and protect them from attacks by third parties. And we have funded their nuclear program to the tune of $150 billion.
This is similar to Clinton’s North Korea agreement, where we agreed to build them a free nuclear power plant, pay them hundreds of millions, give them free fuel oil, and in return they would allow inspections at their old labs. Of course, they just moved down the road a couple of miles and continued working. Free money, fake inspections, and kick the can down the road.
Iran certified it had no nuclear program in 2015, and Kerry and Obama believed them.
If this is “old news” why the heck would Obama/Kerry accept a known lie?
Still supporting the Mullah’s I see.
Michael Hayden is admitting that our intelligence community knew that the Iranians were cheating and that his masters: Barack Obama and Valerie Jarret also knew it and decided to do nothing about. Thanks Mike.
You really think Hayden has more credibility?
From CNN, of course...
More accurately, Michael Hayden - an avowed anti-Trumper - is hell-bent on destroying the credibility of Trump and his allies. Hayden laced his statements with terms like “might” and “may”, but I don’t recall him saying that the Iranians are “...still bad folks. They’re still heading in a bad direction...” when Obama pushed for the Iranian nuclear deal.
This article coming from CNN and avowed anti-Trumper Mike Haydn has no credibility. Haydn is blackballed from serving in the government in any capacity so believe nothing he has to say.
“Ouch. Benjamin Netanyahu seems hell-bent on destroying his credibility.”
No WisconsinRep, it is you that is destroying your credibility. Go play at DU.
BN’s presentation was to show the world the depth of Persian mendacity and send a message to the turban turning clerics what other info Israel now possesses that is very current and of course shared with DJT. The Israelis did not go to all this trouble risk,and expense to spirit 20 year old documents out of Theran
Hayden knows this full well and is engaging in a common DC trick, deflection.
The Likud is such a echo chamber of stupidity that they actually believed the dog & pony show yesterday would be effective.
should have used Colin Powell as the presenter
LOL
Having lived in Israel, I trust Bibi far more than nearly any politician here in the USA.
For sure more than any ex-CIA agent who used to work for Obama.
Hayden is admitting that the Kenyanesian Usurper KNEW that Iran was lying.
Oh well, if it’s not a surprise and they’ve been lying all along then it’s ok if they’re a thuggish terrorist nation out to destroy us.
Benjamin Netanyahu has more credibility in his pinky finger than the never Trumper dirtbag Mikey Hayden has in his Obama butt-kissing body.
Right. The prime minister of Israel, a decorated war hero, doesn’t know what’s going on with his country’s greatest enemy. Tell me another.
Your joking right? Netanyahu has more credibility in his pinkie than you or Hayden. Nice drive by trolling there newbie, now run back to DU.
So those that accepted the deal are traitors.