[madison10]

Could you translate? Who is using Maggie?

[STARLIT]

NEW YORK TIMES!!

She was mentioned in wikileaks several times during the campaign. She was often used.(willingly) to get the DNC message out. Trying to find some of the wikileak e-mails but of course they are hidden in Google search.

[saywhatagain]

This is so convoluted, but actually makes sense

It starts with H putting out an article from a Trump Lawyer warning Trump that Cohen can not be trusted, He will flip. When that first came out . . . It made no sense for alot of reasons.

Trump follows with a tweet ripping into how H is a third rate reporter So, then Q post as an Anon the first part of the Post. Then uses that Post to explain what the hell is going on.

Big mis-direction play. H is good . Cohen is good according to Q

But am thinking there is another twist to this . . . ARGH

[saywhatagain]

Oh sorry Maggie is a reporter for Politico. Maggie Halperben (spelling)??

[STARLIT]

WikiLeaks Outs NYT Maggie Haberman as Clinton Operative

Maggie Haberman is one of the most dishonest journalists I have ever come across. Going back five years to when she was still with Politico, I have repeatedly exposed her lies and fraud. She is currently with the New York Times, and thanks to WikiLeaks, we now have incontrovertible proof that Haberman is nothing more than a spin doctor for Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

Glenn Greenwald:

One January 2015 strategy document — designed to plant stories on Clinton’s decision-making process about whether to run for president — singled out reporter Maggie Haberman, then of Politico, now covering the election for the New York Times, as a “friendly journalist” who has “teed up” stories for them in the past and “never disappointed” them. Nick Merrill, the campaign press secretary, produced the memo, according to the document metadata:

That strategy document plotted how Clinton aides could induce Haberman to write a story on the thoroughness and profound introspection involved in Clinton’s decision-making process. The following month, when she was at the Times, Haberman published two stories on Clinton’s vetting process; in this instance, Haberman’s stories were more sophisticated, nuanced, and even somewhat more critical than what the Clinton memo envisioned.

But they nonetheless accomplished the goal Clinton campaign aides wanted to fulfill of casting the appearance of transparency on Clinton’s vetting process in a way that made clear she was moving carefully but inexorably toward a presidential run.

NIKK-Google has erased information on her...I HAD TO USE BING!

[saywhatagain]

Addendum . . . Maggie Bad Cohen Good or shall we say POTUS in tweet says he is good.

Q used the set-up from the Podesta email leak, showing how Clinton Op uses the press. . I still think Q posted the part that was needed in the Anon board to set up the post.