Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning

Sure. The elderly lawyer speaking as a guest had earlier said the contract was not valid without TRUMP’S signature. But then he researched it fairly thoroughly and had to change his view.
***********************************************************
That’s business law 101. Offer made, Offer Accepted, Consideration ($$). That’s all that is needed for an enforceable contract.

Way back before I retired, there was an interesting case involving Texaco. Hand shake deal. Court ruled that Contract had to be honored. Mucho Bucks.

Also, if there is a written contract, that’s it. No matter what was said during the talks etc. if it’s not in writing, it’s not part of the contract—the reasoning is if it was important to the contract, it would have been included in the writing.

Therefore, if a discussion is held that is important, add it to the written contract, else it’s not considered part of that contract—but I’m thinking that a jury might not agree with that.


2,310 posted on 04/10/2018 10:57:40 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2067 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

Interesting. imho, Texans used to be real keen on honoring their word as their bond. That was certainly true with Qx’s ancestors.


2,313 posted on 04/10/2018 11:03:39 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson