Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

So how much profit would have been eaten up by those added costs I listed, after secession?


338 posted on 04/21/2018 11:49:30 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
You're not going to answer, so maybe I can get you to react to a guess. Let's say 5% each for shipping, warehousing, insurance, losses not covered by insurance, sales commissions, and interest. That's 30%. So Southern plantation owners stood to add 10% extra profits by cutting out New York merchants and banks, while adding ALL the risk for the entire pipeline. Not to mention tying up all their capital and/or going heavily into debt to finance expansion.

With thinking like that it's no wonder they lost the war!

339 posted on 04/21/2018 11:59:04 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I think it would have made profit. It would have been a net gain, instead of a net loss. Well, a net gain for the Southern companies anyway.


425 posted on 04/23/2018 7:44:31 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson