Replies

Conversation getting out of control. Conflating facts with opinions.

Yes, I know what Q said and says. Q is not omnipotent and more importantly we are not really sure of the meaning without explanation, specially written in such a cryptic manner.

So we have group here, and certainly 80% of anons believing that crashes and accident are targeted. In fact Q said it very specifically as such.

Q Post 259

RED RED 9/11.
Funds raised vs distributed?
Oversight?
7/10 plane crashes are targeted kills.
Those in the know never sleep.
Q

Not to confuse and mix apples and oranges, for this conversation stay focused on airplanes or things that defy gravity and stay aloft in the sky. Witnesses on the ground being assassinated is another subject, cars being manupulated another focus. Ships radars being jammed another conversation.

Without me and xone and even you skyPilot, going into technical detail explaining why it is absurd to believe that 7 out of 10 airplane crashes are targeted kills, is there anyone here who questions that statement? I am not talking about agreeing or disagreeing . . . do you even challenge or question that statement?

If by some illusion, one believes 7/10 airplane crashes are targeted, would you think twice getting on a commercial airplane. Now xone and skyPilot, if I as investigator or instructor stood in front of your class and explained that 7/10 airplane crashes were targeted kills, you both have me grounded in a nano second. If commercial pilots even thought of that statement for more than 2 nano-seconds, the whole commericial aviation industry would stop operation 5 minutes ago.

Without getting technical, trying common sense and logic first. How does one explain the sudden rise in accidents? xone articulated that very well already. In my world we call it "statistics" and I am sorry sometimes shit really does happen.

As xone explained, the military due to cutbacks in spending has a huge "training" problem right now. It will be fixed and all will be good.