Q Anon: (4/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 4/2/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[Cboldt]

I don't see much discusison of Bolton's whereabouts or actions on 8chan either.

I'd expect a bit of a whirlwind for him for a month or so, in between cleaning house and getting up to speed on the workload. It's a focal point position, involving input from disparate agencies.

[txhurl]

Did I miss the Bolton discussion while I was asleep?

---

We must have. You’d think it’d be Topic A.

[bagster]

I make my mission to express my point of view, not to make converts.

Please do what you can to convert me, if you see me going out of bounds. I respect your intellect and am not askurd of your aggressive manner of debate.

I hate to be stuck on stupid and want to be in possession of the truth whenever I can be. My mission is to ask questions and toss out theories, hoping to be corrected and steered to the truth of a thing.

I bet there are many others here who appreciate your (and others') knowledge and willingness to share it with the group.

Ass kissing mode: OFF.

[EMI_Guy]

“Bigfoots”...at least that’s how the Bigfoot Research Organization references more than one.

[defconw]

No, Ohio

[bagster]

Bolton hasn’t been seriously discussed yet, I don’t think.

[TXnMA]

Is that your handiwork?

Whoever did it, it is well done and extremely powerful!

Nicely done!

[Jane Long]

Amb Bolton has been tweeting, the past couple of days. No specific location mentioned, though. 🤔

[defconw]

That’s why there is no talk about Bolton. I could not find anything on him in the last couple of days. Follow Bolton is not really anything we can do until Bolton does something.

[edzo4]

According to judicial watch there was a FOIA request for the recordings of the tarmac meeting which was denied.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/nsa-blocks-release-loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-airplane-tape-national-security/

Kawa’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the NSA was denied, citing national security, but the NSA did not deny that the tape exists.

“To respond to your request, NSA would have to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence records on Loretta Lynch,” the agency stated in its FOIA response on November 14, days after the election. “Were we to do so in your case, we would have to do so for every other requester. This would enable, for example, a terrorist or other adversary to file a FOIA request with us in order to determine whether he or she was under surveillance or had evaded it. This is turn would allow that individual to better assess whether they could successfully act to damage the national security of the United States. For such reasons, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence or non-existence of the records you requested.”

---

https://americansecuritytoday.com/recording-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting/

Kawa stated that “the Defense Informations Systems Agency manages the monitoring of telephonic devices and electronic communication systems a board the airplane of certain government officials including the Attorney General, who is required to use a government issued plane for all travel both personal and business.”

Kawa has filed a FOIA request with several government agencies including the FBI, which can be found here.

The FOIA law allows for expedited processing in under 10 days in “unusual circumstances” consistent with those described above regarding the need for immediate public disclosure of government related business.

Kawa states, “In conclusion, it was statutorily required for Loretta Lynch to be on a government plane, which she was on June 27, 2016 when she met with President Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Phoenix.”

“The Tempest Emanations program through the NSA and NATO monitored the telephonic and computer devices on that plane through the VOSIP component of CommSec (Communications Security).

“Data captured would have included audio and video through the plans telephonic, computer, and other electronic devices. Such information would be captured and stored by the NSA and it should be publicly available through FOIA.”

---

https://www.wired.com/2008/04/nsa-releases-se/

Far across the lab, a freestanding oscilloscope had developed a habit of spiking every time the teletype encrypted a letter. Upon closer inspection, the spikes could actually be translated into the plain message the machine was processing. Though he likely didn’t know it at the time, the engineer had just discovered that all information processing machines send their secrets into the electromagnetic ether.

Call it a TEMPEST in a teletype.

This story of how the United States first learned about the fundamental security vulnerability called “compromising emanations” is revealed for the first time in a newly-declassified 1972 paper TEMPEST: A Signal Problem (.pdf), from the National Security Agency’s secret in-house journal Cryptologic Spectrum.

“There has always been speculation about TEMPEST coming out of the Cold War period,” says Joel McNamara, author of Secrets of Computer Espionage: Tactics and Countermeasures, who maintained for years the best compilation of public information on TEMPEST. “But the 1943 Bell Labs discovery is roughly ten years earlier than I would have expected.”

The unnamed Bell Telephone technician was the Alexander Graham Bell of a new, secret science, in which electronic eavesdroppers – as far away as hundreds of feet from their target tune into radio waves leaking from electronic equipment to steal secrets.

Building on the breakthrough, the U.S. developed and refined the science in an attempt to spy on the Soviets during the Cold War. And it issued strict standards for shielding sensitive buildings and equipment. Those rules are now known to government agencies and defense contractors as TEMPEST, and they apply to everything from computer monitors to encrypted cell phones that handle classified information.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

But, it is already cut&pasted -right there- in its original for everyone to read, Comprendez?

6m Cletus@Cletus: But, it is already cut&pasted -right there- in its original for everyone to read, Comprendez?

[9YearLurker]

So I see a qanon follower with the twitter handle of @WWG1WGA — any other ideas on the reference?

And “Clean.”?

Otherwise, not seeing much new or telltale.

[Lady Heron]

Cheatin’ Obama

Well that will stir the pot today. Do the press ask what he means for fear they will get an answer??? FIRE IN THE HOLE!

[fatima]

So Q says the Seals will be broken.Guess we will be seeing some arrests.I’m going to put the news on.

[grey_whiskers]

What about USC 1983, deprivation of rights under colour of law?

[bagster]

Haha. Thanks, EMI. I was making a "Proudfoots"/"Proudfeet" Lord of the Rings reference, but it's good to know.

Bigfoots it is.

Sidebar: I went to visit my ex wife's family in Mississippi once. A cousin in law regaled me with a fine tale of walking into a Bigfoot festival in the woods where the Bigfoots were dancing around a campfire.

I looked at him to see him, ready to laugh along with the joke. He wasn't laughing.

I was all like.....uhhhhhhhh....alrighty, then.

[Cboldt]

I generally don't mean to be aggressive in debate, just terse, efficient. I know more is often and natrually read into my style and not infrequent "inartful expression."

Sometimes I "get into it" with an opponent. You'd notice the difference. I did so in the Cruz in eligible/ineligible debates with a handful of posters that I genuinely disrepsect.

-- ... hoping to be corrected and steered to the truth --

I'd be one of the last people you would want to count on, in that regard.

Nearly 100% of the time, being wrong has ZERO ramification, but when a fact is important to you, do the heavy lifting yourself. I trust ZERO of what I read on FR. Literally ZERO. That's why I make an effort to link to sources (not in every post, but somewhere along the line of making a contention), so people can dismiss my take. If I can look it up, so can everybody else.

-- I bet there are many others here who appreciate your (and others') knowledge and willingness to share it with the group. --

Yes, of course. And I appreciate the thoughts and gratitude. There is also a nont-insignificant population that finds me wrong and a boor. So goes the war.

[txhurl]

Yeah, last night’s drops kinda move us to DEFCON 2, IMO.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: the first time Trump has referred to “Cheatin’ Obama”? ::

Did Trump get Reggie to flip?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

We need to do research on how/why this group of people came to be on the SAME flight.