Q Anon: (4/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 4/2/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[STARLIT]

Diversion...

[STARLIT]

#Trump Tells Latvian President to Call on Baltic Reporter, Not 'Fake News' US Press.

At least its moving forward...Texokie.

[Diogenesis]

[TEXOKIE]

I can understand the techie limitations. I appreciate your kind words, and you are welcome for any kindness I might be able to offer, but my opinion still holds:

That is an interesting perspective you offered!

I have always valued your contributions! :-D

[Chuckster]

It was no accident. There’s definitely something there.

[STARLIT]

[Cboldt]

The thing about military tribunals vs civilian courts, is military tribunal (not courts martial) depend on being is a state of war, and generally applied against non-citizens due to a build up of certain due-process rights over a couple centuries of law.

Wiki is a fair intro.

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) is the modern case of a civilian aimed at a military tribunal. Reaching a conclusive opinion was short circuited as the Bush admin eventually shuttled Hamdi to the civilian courts. Scalia's dissent in Hamdi is pretty good.

Where the Government accuses a citizen of waging war against it, our constitutional tradition has been to prosecute him in federal court for treason or some other crime. Where the exigencies of war prevent that, the Constitution's Suspension Clause, Art. I, S:9, cl. 2, allows Congress to relax the usual protections temporarily.

Thomas came out in the opposite direction ...

The Executive Branch, acting pursuant to the powers vested in the President by the Constitution and with explicit congressional approval, has determined that Yaser Hamdi is an enemy combatant and should be detained. This detention falls squarely within the Federal Government's war powers, and we lack the expertise and capacity to second-guess that decision. As such, petitioners' habeas challenge should fail, and there is no reason to remand the case.

It is one thing to be heavy-handed with Hamdi, and another thing to be heavy-handed against a somewhat popular politician, even one that sold the country to the highest bidder.

I encourage at least a skim through the Scalia and Thomas dissents in the Hamdi case to get a reasonable idea of the arguments that would be sure to surface, should Trump choose to prosecute ANY American citizen in a military tribunal. Not saying it can't be done, but the tidy way is to get Congress to suspend habeas corpus. That is a big deal, as Biden would say.

[STARLIT]

[TEXOKIE]

Well summarized and said, Bv

[TEXOKIE]

Those are good!

[TEXOKIE]

MAGA!

[STARLIT]

Lisa Crowley-Sure doesn't sound like a white female with a dark top and white head scarf to me..

.Paul Joseph Watson-

‏- Eyewitness to shooting: “I was in the courtyard and we heard the gunshots then saw him. He had a shooting mask on, full body armor and was calmly walking and firing a handgun."

[greeneyes]

I’ll vote for that. Hallelujha and speed up the indictments.

[greeneyes]

hallelujah (I didn’t catch transposition)

[StormFlag]

From the Wash Post

“Mueller told Trump’s attorneys the president remains under investigation but is not currently a criminal target”

Considering the source, but still interesting...

[bitt]

https://twitter.com/Nick_Falco/status/981221593002033152

Mueller’s response to Manafort

[Chuckster]

A man’s gotta eat.

[Cboldt]

Tucker Carlson mentioned a WaPo story coming out, Mueller has told Trump's lawyers that Trump is NOT a target of investigation; and has also said Mueller plans to issue some sort of report on the question of obstruction.

Mini-boom, maybe. I expect a tweet if the WaPo story gets the usual legs this sort of story gets. "No collusion. Witch Hunt! Shut-it-down!"

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Ah well. At least it promoted discussion.

[StormFlag]

Roenstein’s August permission slip is an interesting revelation. It sure seems that this was all set up a long time ago.