The guy in the video said it was a beam weapon that destroyed the Arby’s. The Arby’s, in fact, burned a day later when workers arrived to prepare food for first responders and some equipment failed. It had nothing to do weapons. I see neighborhoods where everything burned except a home or two, hill sides denuded except for a small pocket valley. It has to do with terrain, wind direction, wind speed, relative humidity, elements preheated by advancing flames and hot dry wind. Watch a few videos, and there are many excellent ones, on how to read fires. This is all perfectly normal and occurs in every major wildfire, things that you wouldn’t think would burn do and things that should don’t. I saw it burn across the ranch I live on where I was able to bump it around some structures and others, no matter what I did, water, dry chem, foam, nothing would stop it.
By the way, this fire followed the same route as the one in 1964 and another in 1923. What weapons were used then? What agenda were they advancing then? The homes and areas that were spared then were very similar to those that were spared this last go around. Terrain, wind direction, wind speed, humidity, fuel load are the determinants nor conspiracy theories.
And it is Mr. Nitwhit to you.
.
You’re apparently deliberately ignoring reality.
I said nothing about Arby’s. There were numerous blocks with all of the trees untouched yet all or most of the houses burned flat.
There is also considerable video of plasma tracks of beam weapons being distorted in the winds, so they were indeed deployed during the high winds.
And the simple obvious fact of the boundary of burn out areas exactly matching the planning maps is way beyond any natural explanation.