Replies

The grids are prepared from the contents of Trumps "errant" tweets. Trump tweets something with an "error". Then he reposts again with the tweet "fixed". SerialBrain goes back and gets the original text that has since been deleted and finds out what time that "errant" tweet was posted. Then he compares to the time the "fixed" tweet was posted. That difference determines the the delta which is then used to specify the width of the grid onto which to plot the characters (letters) from the tweet.

Here is the text of the (this time BOTH "errant" and - NOT - "fixed"0 tweet that makes up the first line of the grid, continuing on to the second line, etc.

“Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because.....

Then the second line / row in the grid is mapped from the next part of the tweet:

“Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because.....

Then the third row in the grid:

“Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because.....

ROW 1: Special Council is told to find
ROW 2: crimes, whether a crime exists o
ROW 3: r not. I was opposed to the select

You get the idea now ;)

Here's the thing - it ONLY works when you use the "errant" tweet that first appears and is then "fixed". The time between those is the delta to map the number of columns to.

THIS TIME TRUMP LEFT THE TWEET WITH "Special Council" - when it's supposed to be "CounSEl" and his twitter feed is littered with libs mocking the "error" and that THIS TIME HE LEFT THE "ERRANT" TWEET UP - because if you change "council" to "counsel" - guess what, you just added a character to the grid - and in this case there are TWO occurrences of the "error" so it would shift again below and make the whole thing unintelligible.

HOWEVER as you see that SerialBrain discovered, when you map an "errant" tweet into a grid that is sized to a width being the number of minutes between the "errant" tweet and the "fixed" one ... you rather get very intelligible perceivable messages!

TBD ... love the message! ;)

KAG!

That is wild. I have to wonder what this guy does for a living. It takes a special kind of brain to think the way he does. It's WAY beyond anything a regular person could do.

I'll have to check out some of his other stuff, fascinating.

Looks like a great work. I just don’t have a lot of motivation to get up to speed on it, figuring it out. Much appreciate whatever conclusions you come up with via your grid.

Brilliant! You are a genius. Thank you!

Great find and very great analysis!

I love it when a plan comes together...

mark

Many thanks for the analysis and pix!