Replies

I am going to post entire SerialBrain sequence for those that haven't seen this before ... we know there are puzzles within the puzzle - such is the nature of "Q" ;)

And we know we have more than we know ...

The premise here is that when Trump makes spelling "mistakes" on his tweets that there is more there than meets the eye. SerialBrain checked the deltas when this would happen and then use that amount of time as the width of a grid to map the contents of the tweet into. This is the 7th time he's done this & this is the most impressive by far ... his posts were widely acclaimed in Reddit CBTS but then deleted & the channel banned so now he's a little more discreet in his posting(s).

Here's today's tweet that was the subject of ridicule by the left. Trump appears to have rather left intact this time so the we can continue to see what happens - when this happened previously you had to go to one of the "Q" boards that aggregates "Q" posts with Trump tweets and even saves off the deleted or modified ones to confirm what the original ("errant") text was and confirm the delta.

In this case the delta was 26 minutes.

4:29 AM - 21 Mar 2018
“Special Council is told to find crimes, whether a crime exists or not. I was opposed to the selection of Mueller to be Special Council. I am still opposed to it. I think President Trump was right when he said there never should have been a Special Council appointed because.....

4:11 AM - 21 Mar 2018
...there was no probable cause for believing that there was any crime, collusion or otherwise, or obstruction of justice!” So stated by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

The "errant" tweet was first published at 4:03 AM, deleted and re-tweeted at 4:29 AM.

So his delta is 26 minutes - then he maps the contents of the tweet into a grid which is 26 columns wide. He first postulated that it would be an NxN grid i.e. 26x26 but all you really need is the width.

That's how he gets:

SerialBrain NOTEs - "Remember, we are not moving randomly across the grid. We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal."

The result with a

"SpecialCouncil crimes are in. I have intel he's on to cite Clinton"

Interesting post. My initial impression is that such a probability for this to be a coincidence is small. We are dealing with just the quote. The end part - So stated by... is not part of the decoded message. I am of the opinion that if the decode was intentional, this tweet might have been an fortunate opportunity. In no way do I think that Dershowitz had any knowledgeable part.

Since the direct quote from Dershowitz is the key, the suggestion of an embedded decode requires the coordination between Dershowitz and someone from the Trump people. While Dershowitz defends Trump on the Special Council, in no way has he suggested that Clinton should be indicted. He was just on Hannity and he acknowledged upon prodding from Hannity that he agreed that any wrong doing should be investigating. He was not in front espousing additional investigation. Having listened to Dershowitz over a period of time, this coordination and intentionality is patently absurd.

The opportunity of the message is what should be considered. First of all, you need someone to find the opportunity of the wording as well as the desire to deliver the message. For that you need experts in coding that works with Trump and has shared this opportunity with him. We would all presume that this would be Q or someone that Q works with. Also these tweets would have to be prepared for Trump and instructions given on the 26 minutes. I suspect if this were so, the operative(s) would have posted the tweets with the President's permission. I would suspect that Q would post something about it even though this decode is on Steven W's post (and a few others in this overall thread). Note that Q does answer some Anons.