Q Anon: (3/20/18) Continued from Sunday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

1,141 posted on 03/22/2018 4:00:32 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)

1,142 posted on 03/22/2018 4:04:46 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Francis is a Nincompope.)

Brilliant! You are a genius. Thank you!

1,143 posted on 03/22/2018 4:13:51 AM PDT by TrueFact (The Republicans keep putting the stopper back in the swamp drain.)

I will get you more details in a bit. Working on the 1.5 billion dollar E Schmidt campaign program for the queen HRC. The OIG is obligated to refer to criminal prosecution the moment a crime is discovered. I find the explanation in bit. Will finis my other massive rollout. LoL

1,144 posted on 03/22/2018 4:21:32 AM PDT by saywhatagain

For me its guess. The intel guy is either Brennan or Clapper. I think Brennan but most others say Clapper.

politicians probably include Schumer, pelosi, Shiffhead, and am sure a Republican or two.

1,145 posted on 03/22/2018 4:24:10 AM PDT by saywhatagain

1,146 posted on 03/22/2018 4:25:48 AM PDT by defconw (Because Americans are dreamers, too!)

To: saywhatagain

Appreciate all you do. My only point was a nitpick. I don't think any prosecutor appointed or tasked to work with Horowitz is doing a parallel/repetitive investigation. For future defendants in Horowitz scope, the prosecutor is selecting charges, making charging and bargaining decisions, preparing indictments, and so on. He's not doing a parallel investigation, he's taking the next step in criminal prosecutions.

1,147 posted on 03/22/2018 4:27:25 AM PDT by Cboldt

To: saywhatagain

So much to unpack. If the masses understood all this here on a deep level, there would be a revolution. The following is a copied email from E. Schmidt to Cheryl Mills. This was a 1.5 billion dollar campaign donation. This was done outside any registered pac. Towards the bottom, one can get a general idea how analytics is accomplished.

Source of email: wikileaks.org/podesta

From another post, see Pay-to-Play New World Order Timeline. Slow to open, but much data.

Pay-to-Play New World Order

From:cheryl.mills@gmail.com
To: robbymook@gmail.com, john.podesta@gmail.com,
daplouffe@icloud.com
Date: 2014-04-15 17:16
Subject: Fwd: 2016 thoughts

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Eric Schmidt
Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:56 PM
Subject: 2016 thoughts
To: Cheryl Mills

Cheryl, I have put together my thoughts on the campaign ideas and I have scheduled some meetings in the next few weeks for veterans of the campaign to tell me how to make these ideas better. This is simply a draft but do let me know if this is a helpful process for you all. Thanks !!

Eric

*********************************

Notes for a 2016 Democratic Campaign
Eric Schmidt April 2014

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Here are some comments and observations based on what we saw in the 2012 campaign. If we get started soon, we will be in a very strong position to execute well for 2016.

1. Size, Structure and Timing

Lets assume a total budget of about $1.5 Billion, with more than 5,000 paid employees and million(s) of volunteers. The entire startup ceases operation four days after November 8, 2016. The structure includes a Chairman or Chairwoman who is the external face of the campaign and a President who is the executive in charge of objectives, measurements, systems and building and managing the organization.

Every day matters as our end date does not change. An official campaign right after midterm elections and a preparatory team assembled now is best.

2. Location

The campaign headquarters will have about a thousand people, mostly young and hardworking and enthusiastic. Its important to have a very large hiring pool (such as Chicago or NYC) from which to choose enthusiastic, smart and low paid permanent employees. DC is a poor choice as its full of distractions and interruptions. Moving the location from DC elsewhere guarantees visitors have taken the time to travel and to help.

The key is a large population of talented people who are dying to work for you. Any outer borough of NYC, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Boston are all good examples of a large, blue state city to base in.

Employees will relocate to participate in the campaign, and will find low cost temporary housing or live with campaign supporters on a donated basis. This worked well in Chicago and can work elsewhere.

The computers will be in the cloud and most likely on Amazon Web services (AWS). All the campaign needs are portable computers, tablets and smart phones along with credit card readers.

3. The pieces of a Campaign

a) The Field

Its important to have strong field leadership, with autonomy and empowerment. Operations talent needs to build the offices, set up the systems, hire the people, and administer what is about 5000 people. Initial modeling will show heavy hiring in the key battleground states. There is plenty of time to set these functions up and build the human systems. The field is about organizing people, voter contact, and get out the vote programs.

For organizing tools, build a simple way to link people and activities as a workflow and let the field manage the system, all cloud based. Build a simple organizing tool with a functioning back-end. Avoid deep integration as the benefits are not worth it. Build on the cloud. Organizing is really about sharing and linking people, and this tool would measure and track all of it.

There are many other crucial early investments needed in the field: determining the precise list of battleground states, doing early polling to confirm initial biases, and maintaining and extending voter protection programs at the state level.

b) The Voter

Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify, meet, and update profiles on the voter. A dynamic volunteer can easily speak with a voter and, with their email or other digital handle, get the voter videos and other answers to areas they care about ("the benefits of ACA to you" etc.)

The scenario includes a volunteer on a walk list, encountering a potential voter, updating the records real time and deepening contact with the voter and the information we have to offer. c) Digital

A large group of campaign employees will use digital marketing methods to connect to voters, to offer information, to use social networks to spread good news, and to raise money. Partners like Blue State Digital will do much of the fund raising. A key point is to convert BSD and other partners to pure cloud service offerings to handle the expected crush and load.

d) Media (paid), (earned) and (social), and polling

New tools should be developed to measure reach and impact of paid, earned and social media. The impact of press coverage should be measurable in reach and impact, and TV effectiveness measured by attention and other surveys.

Build tools that measure the rate and spread of stories and rumors, and model how it works and who has the biggest impact. Tools can tell us about the origin of stories and the impact of any venue, person or theme. Connect polling into this in some way.

Find a way to do polling online and not on phones.

e) Analytics and data science and modeling, polling and resource optimization tools

For each voter, a score is computed ranking probability of the right vote. Analytics can model demographics, social factors and many other attributes of the needed voters. Modeling will tell us what who we need to turn out and why, and studies of effectiveness will let us know what approaches work well. Machine intelligence across the data should identify the most important factors for turnout, and preference.

It should be possible to link the voter records in Van with upcoming databases from companies like Comcast and others for media measurement purposes.

The analytics tools can be built in house or partnered with a set of vendors.

f) Core engineering, voter database and contact with voters online

The database of voters (NGP Van) is a fine starting point for voter records and is maintained by the vendor (and needs to be converted to the cloud). The code developed for 2012 (Narwahl etc.) is unlikely to be used, and replaced by a model where the vendor data is kept in the Van database and intermediate databases are arranged with additional information for a voter.

Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign is a "voter", and each and every record is viewable and updatable by volunteers in search of more accurate information.

In the case where we can't identify the specific human, we can still have a partial digital voter id, for a person or "probable-person" with attributes that we can identify and use to target. As they respond we can eventually match to a registered voter in the main file. This digital key is eventually matched to a real person.

The Rules

Its important that all the player in the campaign work at cost and there be no special interests in the financing structure. This means that all vendors work at cost and there is a separate auditing function to ensure no one is profiting unfairly from the campaign. All investments and conflicts of interest would have to be publicly disclosed. The rules of the audit should include caps on individual salaries and no investor profits from the campaign function. (For example, this rule would apply to me.)

The KEY things

a) early build of an integrated development team and recognition that this is an entire system that has to be managed as such

b) decisions to exclusively use cloud solutions for scalability, and choice of vendors and any software from 2012 that will be reused.

c) the role of the smart phone in the hands of a volunteer. The smart phone manages the process, updates the database, informs the citizen, and allows fundraising and recruitment of volunteers (on android and iphone).

d) early and continued focus of qualifying fundraising dollars to build the field, and build all the tools. Outside money will be plentiful and perfect for TV use. A smart media mix tool tells all we need to know about media placement, TV versus other media and digital media.

1,148 posted on 03/22/2018 4:28:57 AM PDT by saywhatagain

Well taken all good. Tough to express thoughts completely in this format but we mangle our way through. Lol.

The following is an excerpt from CTH explanation. I have seen better, but this should work. In another source, they actually gave the name of the other unit doing the criminal part. I would have to dig deep to find. Am bad at bookmarking and filing. Just read and keep it all upstairs between the ears.

Additionally, the OIG (Horowitz) would want to keep the testimony of Page, Strzok, Ohr, Baker and Priestap away from the Democrat politicians, well known leakers, within the House Intelligence Committee (ie. Eric Swalwell and Adam Schiff) until he was certain their usefulness as witnesses was exhausted.

The reason for this is transparently simple. The OIG is a division inside the Department of Justice. During an internal investigation if the IG becomes aware of unlawful activity he/she is obligated to inform the AG (Sessions) or AAG (Rosenstein). He can’t ignore it and he cannot delay notification of it. Unlawful activity must be reported.

The IG does not have legal or prosecutorial authority – the IG must immediately refer unlawful activity to the proper authority; essentially to his boss. A DOJ prosecutor is then assigned to work with the IG and essentially creates a parallel investigation focused only on the law-breaking part. [That prosecutor could, likely would, then begin a Grand Jury proceeding; no-one outside the AG, AAG, and that prosecutor’s office would know.]

The prior testimony/statements to the IG by the fab-five would explain why AAG Rod Rosenstein was negotiating with Devin Nunes, and why Nunes came away from those negotiations with wind in his investigative sails.

1,149 posted on 03/22/2018 4:42:00 AM PDT by saywhatagain

To: saywhatagain

Maybe we are just debating the meaning of the word "parallel."

My nitpick is that the prosecutor doesn't have to "reinvestigate" or "parallel investigate." Like any police/prosecutor hand off, the prosecutor relies on the investigator for most evidence.

As I mentioned in my previous, not only is OIG limited in terms of power (investigation only), he is also limited in terms of target (DOJ only, for Horowitz). And in range of target, he is limited in power to compel testimony, being restricted to government employees - once out, also out of OIG reach.

I totally agree that assignment (the word I would use in conjunction with an inside prosecutor) or appointment (the word Sessions used, and the word used in conjunction with Special Counsel) of a prosecutor is absolutely essential. Signs are that this investigator (Horowitz) is already partnered with a prosecutorial team.

1,150 posted on 03/22/2018 5:08:37 AM PDT by Cboldt

To: saywhatagain

Early on, probably in a different thread, I said I thought AG Sessions was the right man for the job; that he wasn’t any ‘Rip Van Winkle” and that he needed the time to do his job correctly so there would be no wiggle room for the accused. At the time, others pounced on my comment.I am beginning to feel vindicated.

I also thought, and still do, that the supposed rub between the AG and President Trump was designed to misdirect the Deep State. Come to find out it was only partially effective.

Seems McCabe and company had intentions of removing Sessions a year ago. The deep state, cabal already knew how large a threat he was.

I now believe they think the AG may be their worst nightmare. He knows how to use the laws effectively, all the while holding his cards close to his vest.

1,151 posted on 03/22/2018 5:10:20 AM PDT by Kalam (<: The answer is 42 :>)

I find it hard to believe Jeff didn’t know Andy had opened a case against him, but maybe Wray had to discover and advise him of it. In that case, Trust Wray & Sessions is far more palatable.

1,152 posted on 03/22/2018 5:17:06 AM PDT by txhurl (The Final Thunderdome: Two Americas enter, One America leaves)

Got it . . . re-reading the article from CTH, that concurs more how you are expressing than I. I am amazed that we have not heard a single word or explanation from strzok, page, priestap etc. Nobody even confirms they are showing up at the office everyday. The more we learn, it is far more ugly than I could have imagined.

1,153 posted on 03/22/2018 5:20:10 AM PDT by saywhatagain

Bill Gates did something similar, contracted to develop a friendlier operating system for ??? (can’t remember who) and launched Windows, having funded it by the contract work that he and his group did for the other company.

1,154 posted on 03/22/2018 5:24:01 AM PDT by CatQuilt (Lover of cats =^..^= and quilts)

1,155 posted on 03/22/2018 5:26:59 AM PDT by txhurl (The Final Thunderdome: Two Americas enter, One America leaves)

To: Steven W.; bitt

Great find and very great analysis!

I love it when a plan comes together...

1,156 posted on 03/22/2018 5:33:38 AM PDT by USMC79to83

Am I on the right thread? Is this todays? My connection at home has given me a headache.

1,157 posted on 03/22/2018 5:36:10 AM PDT by defconw (Because Americans are dreamers, too!)

Parallel? Think mirror!

1,158 posted on 03/22/2018 5:38:04 AM PDT by MNDude

To: Steve Van Doorn

It’s okay to be a little skeptical. I know cynicism has a way of trying to sneak up on me.
I think we will know a lot more about Tillerson’s character after he does his good byes today. Others who have been shown the door have, for the most part, stayed on Trump’s side (aka the white hats).

1,159 posted on 03/22/2018 5:38:05 AM PDT by Kalam (<: The answer is 42 :>)

This is the place, so far anyway. Fresh space hasn’t been setup.

1,160 posted on 03/22/2018 5:38:41 AM PDT by Cboldt

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794