Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: (3/20/18) Continued from Sunday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/20/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

Posted on 03/20/2018 9:27:44 PM PDT by ransomnote

The picture is taken from Q drop #531. This chess game (i.e., Capablanca Vs Marshal 1918) is a favorite of mine; before Q Anon, I never HAD a favorite chess game. This chess match, played 100 years ago, illustrates a battle in which all hope seems lost, defeat is assured, and then the nearly extinguished enact an unanticipated defensive strategy that wins the game. Sound like anyone we know? :) Among chess players (i.e., not me) some say that match was "beautiful" and "among the 3 finest chess games played in history." At the time of this Q drop, Julian Assange tweeted about this winning strategy and Q Anon seemed to echo with a Q drop of the same famous winning strategy in reply. Some of us believed at the time that it signified a critical win; white defeated the "Black Queen".

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected




TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: arrestq; conspiracytrash; lexicon; q; qanon; qisbomber; qisfake; qistraitor; russianpropagandists; russianpuppets; russianstooges; russiasucks; samhyde; whyissamhydehere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,661-1,670 next last
To: Steven W.

Looks like a great work. I just don’t have a lot of motivation to get up to speed on it, figuring it out. Much appreciate whatever conclusions you come up with via your grid.


1,121 posted on 03/22/2018 12:44:51 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1112 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
No, no no no. . . Its not a jumper. Actually Mueller paid for ticket and advised him it would be good to stand down for awhile. Mueller has been doing this for a long time. Y'all remember James “Whitey” Bulger. Same ole same ole.

"Mueller's actions while in Boston as a criminal prosecutor raised questions about his role in one of the FBI's most controversial cases involving the use of a confidential informant". . . 1986.

Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past

In Boston, Mueller was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office and then became the Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987. It was Mueller’s actions during that time that raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit. Local law enforcement officials, the media, and some colleagues criticized Mueller and the FBI for what they believed was the bureau’s role in covering up for the FBI’s longtime dealings with mobster and informant James “Whitey” Bulger.

Bulger was a kingpin and a confidential informant for the FBI from the 1970s in the bureau’s efforts to take down the Italian mafia in Boston. But Bulger’s relationship with his FBI handler Special Agent John Connolly became toxic. It was later discovered that Connolly went out of his way to protect Bulger and aided the crime boss against investigations being conducted by the Boston PD and the Massachusetts State Police. According to reports at the time, Connolly would inform Bulger of wiretaps and surveillance being conducted by law enforcement.

“As I have mentioned before, under Mueller’s watch in Boston, the second most corrupt relationship between an FBI agent (John Connolly, now in prison for murder-related charges) and his information (Whitey Bulger) unfolded,” said Schoen. “Mueller was neck deep in it and has never answered the questions that the media asked rhetorically, but that should have been asked by a grand jury of Congressional Committee. Even such dubious sources as the NY Times, Boston Globe, and Huffington Post have demanded answers. Many have suggested he should never have been FBI Director.”

Mueller is just a Boy Scout . . . beholden to the master!

1,122 posted on 03/22/2018 12:47:37 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Thanks for the explanation.


1,123 posted on 03/22/2018 12:47:51 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain; bitt
re: #1069 Excellent! ...and incidentally, as I have been posting for years on FR, ABC TV NEWS IS OWNED BY DISNEY! When patriots take their families to Disney parks they are contributing to the overthrow of the Constitution!
1,124 posted on 03/22/2018 12:53:55 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1069 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning
You may have read me saying before. We knew all this stuff going on since Kennedy. My parents and all those around me knew of the corruption. Spoke the same at the dinner table. Yet, seemingly not a damn thing we could do about. I forgot who pointed out the obvious . . . "the failure of the media to hold responsible and accountable."

Our war has to be against the media. Destroy them and we might have a Democracy or at least a Republic as our forefathers designed. Make it Rain!

1,125 posted on 03/22/2018 12:56:00 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1123 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

That sure needs to be a very high priority, alright. Indeed.


1,126 posted on 03/22/2018 12:58:13 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies]

To: Bob Ireland
I agree. Church I was associated with and many others started boycotting Disney in the 80's. Nothing. We lived 7 miles from Disney Anaheim.

Those who see and understand the depth of the corruption can never seem to get any traction. We raise our kids to do right and that seems to be the best we can do.

I am convinced attacking the MSM and destroying them as we know it is part of Q agenda. But again, not making any traction. Exposing the media seems to fall on deaf ears.

1,127 posted on 03/22/2018 1:01:15 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies]

To: Bob Ireland
I agree. Church I was associated with and many others started boycotting Disney in the 80's. Nothing. We lived 7 miles from Disney Anaheim.

Those who see and understand the depth of the corruption can never seem to get any traction. We raise our kids to do right and that seems to be the best we can do.

I am convinced attacking the MSM and destroying them as we know it is part of Q agenda. But again, not making any traction. Exposing the media seems to fall on deaf ears.

1,128 posted on 03/22/2018 1:01:44 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

True; the media is now controlled by billionaires... About all we can do is ignore the (bad) media - and PRAY!


1,129 posted on 03/22/2018 1:06:20 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain; Bob Ireland; JockoManning; Steven W.; bagster; No_Doll_i; ransomnote
Y’all remember the Q post the other night. 959, where Zuck is in a meeting with other blackhats creating a narrative

MZ.
RT.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
+8
5 political 1 former intel dir
Mask & Spin
IDEN friendly ‘insiders’
MSM support +talking points
Shift narrative
FAIL
We hear you.
<***>
Q

Well this is in part what came from that meeting

Niiiiiiiice heh?

At least there is a little pushback . . .

Somehow, the masses has to rise and put this crap down once and for all.

1,130 posted on 03/22/2018 1:21:23 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Bkmk


1,131 posted on 03/22/2018 1:26:13 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 991 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Placemark


1,132 posted on 03/22/2018 1:44:06 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Kalam; little jeremiah

I shouldn’t be so quick to judge people like Tillerson. I shall be more careful.


1,133 posted on 03/22/2018 2:41:08 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
said, "please turn off after the comedy central skit - I did"

Am I the only one that thinks the comedy central skit was great? If I need to explain why you might be missing it. It is about a guy that can't eat the red pill

1,134 posted on 03/22/2018 2:50:23 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
A Pay-to-Play New World Order Timeline.

Timeline shows how insiders sell access and manipulate politicians. Rich with data, pdf files, youtube documentary. A deep rabbit hole. May have posted earlier as I recognize some documents, specially those concerning SES employees. Very informative

620 page pdf file heavy in graphics will be slow to open.

Pay-to-Play New World Order

1,135 posted on 03/22/2018 3:17:40 AM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

Later, thanks


1,136 posted on 03/22/2018 3:21:47 AM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Yulee

True. Students paying out of state tuition are no longer allowed to use ID to vote in Indiana. Effective 2016 election. Obama won state in 2012. Lost in 2016 BIGLY


1,137 posted on 03/22/2018 3:28:43 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; saywhatagain
-- I don't believe IG has that authority only referrals --

-- saywhatagain: That was why Sessions opened up a parallel investigations --

At least that's how the relationship is phrased. It may be that OIG Horowitz and a Sessions-appointed prosecutor are working as a team, with Horowitz doing the investigation and the prosecutor preparing the criminal cases. This way, the legal action is ready to commence the day the report is made public.

I don't see a parallel investigation, that would be inefficient and wasteful.

Another benefit of adding a prosecutor is that a prosecutor (inside -or- SC) may expand investigation to places that are out of Horowitz's scope - such as State Department.

I've speculated that a Special Counsel has been appointed without notice to Congress or the public. This practice is spelled out in DOJ regulations. This would be similar to naming an inside prosecutor, only putting the formal bringing of charges "slightly outside" of the DOJ (using 28 CFR 600 SC regulations). The ready-to-roll timing and scope expansion effects would be the same as with an inside prosecutor.

1,138 posted on 03/22/2018 3:42:03 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

Later


1,139 posted on 03/22/2018 3:56:07 AM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Want to speculate who those six people were?


1,140 posted on 03/22/2018 3:59:36 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,661-1,670 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson