Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SERKIT
I reckon so. Can't think of what would require a military response inside the USA, though.

This may be something else.

Maybe lowering the BOOM on California sanctuary state? Hard to say, really. If that's it, I will buy the Marines some beers when they get here.

900 posted on 03/17/2018 6:59:20 PM PDT by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

Border patrol support.


904 posted on 03/17/2018 7:00:53 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
I reckon so. Can't think of what would require a military response inside the USA, though.

The arrest of the California Legislature, the Governor of California, and the mayors of certain cities. It would put the local and state police on notice not to interfere with a federal action.

(Yes, I'm grasping at straws here.)

But there is a precedent left over from the Civil War. Ten southern states were combined into five military districts and stripped of their statehood. They had to jump through certain hoops to be readmitted.

In 1939, the Supreme Court in Coleman v. Miller elected not to open that can of worms because the Civil War was not that far in the past. So the precedent stands.

922 posted on 03/17/2018 7:06:41 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson