[RoosterRedux]

Here's what Q had to say about McCabe on Thursday the 15th (2 days ago)...

[OwenKellogg]

Q said...

WE HAVE THE SUB.

... could the sub be a subpoena?

[Kalam]

Well there, that makes sense. Whether or not McCabe gets a deal isn’t the end all. The white hats being in control of the outcome is where the rubber meets the road.

[Cboldt]

If we count McCabe coming up in Anon, followed by Q reply, follow the chain from Anon 21533 (quoting Q 158900) to Anon 21545, to Anon 21584, to Q 21679.

The question to focus on is "Who is #2?"

Dec 23 2017 16:40:56 Q !UW.yye1fxo 158900

Side-by-side graphic?
Locate and create.[:22]
SEARCH crumbs : [#2]
Who is #2?
No deals.
[snippage by cboldt]

---

Anonymous 01/07/18 (Sun) 23:07:49 88fa47 No.21533

>>158900
Side-by-side graphic?
Locate and create.[:22]
SEARCH crumbs : [#2]
Who is #2?
No deals.
[snippage by cboldt]

---

Anonymous 01/07/18 (Sun) 23:08:36 5136b9 No.21545

>>21533
Wouldn't #2 be Pence?

---

Anonymous 01/07/18 (Sun) 23:10:25 89d297 No.21584

>>21545
McCabe?

---

Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/07/18 (Sun) 23:15:48 c67299 No.21679

>>21584

[bagster]

Rooster. Where did we get the idea that McCabe was taken to Gitmo and being kept in a black site safe house and giving up the goods. Or was that just me?

I have a very active imagination sometimes.