My goal is to eliminate DACA as a talking point during the campaigns, and thus limit the damage that DACA could do in “image” campaigns, because the action would eliminate that particular image. DACA acts as a filter for less undesirable people — we can use that.
________________________________________________________
All it would take to eliminate the exposure is to have a program to take care of them like I said. Pay a fine, get a green card for 5 years and then qualify for citizenship. That is what legals do, why should the illegals do any less?
All you need is a solution, what the solution is isn’t the important thing, just that there is a solution.
>
My goal is to eliminate DACA as a talking point during the campaigns, and thus limit the damage that DACA could do in image campaigns, because the action would eliminate that particular image. DACA acts as a filter for less undesirable people we can use that.
________________________________________________________
All it would take to eliminate the exposure is to have a program to take care of them like I said. Pay a fine, get a green card for 5 years and then qualify for citizenship. That is what legals do, why should the illegals do any less?
All you need is a solution, what the solution is isnt the important thing, just that there is a solution.
>
WHY would, nay SHOULD, said illegals even be granted the OPTION?
They chose, from the START, to *NOT* follow the rule(s)\Law. Need We import MORE criminals to this nation?? We’re not talking ‘jay-walking’ or even ONCE, but multiple times/day. Just to become a DRAIN on an already illegal/red-ink welfare system.
Hint: 20yrs ‘here’ and STILL hasn’t bothered to even TRY to learn English, they weren’t willing to become an *immigrant*.
Even the ‘back of the line’ is a slap at the immigrants (past\today\future) whom spent “ages” (time, $$, tears) doing the right thing to come here.