That reminds me. Lyn d Rothschild was outed on 8 chan 12/07/2017, and went back and forth Q and Anons. She said something about finishing Thursday night bottle - we all do it.
She posted, LOL drunk post pic Q, maintain your military bearing.
Anyway somewhere along the line, anon said I know how this ends f——t.
She posted, Yep you die of thirst after watching your children die first.
That’s sick.
That is true, greeneyes.
My post 1064 was somewhat whimsical in reaction to that Hillary as Witch picture, but the elites buying up water resources is absolutely happening. CF has its hooks in everything else. If water is expected to be the most valuable resource in coming years, why would she not have done whatever evil proposed to CF to get more $$$$$ by selling more of what is not theirs?
I seem to recall discussions in late Bush years about the buying up of water rights on the part of wealthy elites - including Bushes - out in the plains of KS and OK and elsewhere.
Links from a quick search I did:
https://www.ecori.org/natural-resources/2011/5/9/who-owns-our-water.html
...”“The tension between public ownership and privatization of our water resources is enormous,” said Cheryl King Fisher, executive director of the Vermont-based New England Grassroots Environmental Fund. “Water is the gold of the current century.”
And to many concerned users, there are bandits trying to steal a public resource that is essential to life.
Cashing in a resource
With 85 percent of the people in the United States served by public water companies, multinational corporations see an opportunity to take control of this resource from cash-strapped municipalities in difficult financial times....”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/gwrs/ownership-summary
~ ~ ~ ~
1998 working paper - see pg 5-6 for water discussion.
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/12778/1/ltcwp20.pdf
...”In the spring of 1998, a private company persuaded the provincial government of Ontario to give it the right to extract water from Lake Superior, apparently intending to procure an export market for the same. When this came to light, it became a major scandal and had the Canadian federal government scrambling to find a legal way of voiding the contract, even though the amount of water was small.
As is now recognized by the Canadian government as well as environmentalists, under NAFTA the export of even a small amount of water immediately obliges the Canadian government to allow all water to be treated as a commodity, available on demand at the same commercial rates to any company on this continent. This interpretation has been discussed frequently in environmental circles as a hypothetical possibility, but when the reality suddenly happened the Canadian government acknowledged that the definition of tradable goods under the General Agreement on...”
POSSIBLY ANOTHER REASON TO RENEGOTIATE NAFTA - FROM CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE - from quote above:
...”As is now recognized by the Canadian government as well as environmentalists, under NAFTA the export of even a small amount of water immediately obliges the Canadian government to allow all water to be treated as a commodity, “...