[greeneyes]

These bills are to restrict information on the internet. They have named it to imply preventing sex trafficking. However it’s the usual suspects sponsoring.

I haven’t read them, but Seething Frog was explaining that the way it’s written, it would actually make taking down a site even easier than it is now and criminalize it to boot.

If we have any people versed in legalese, maybe they could weigh in on this. Might need to fight this.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-c...

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-c...

Below is a link to seething frog. He was doing some just in case, planning the last few days, moving to D tube, as well as exploring ham radio and other ways to continue independent news.

He gave a Gmail acct. for people to send in suggestions. Anyway he got some emails about this issue and explains a little about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5E1NxqhAU

[Steven W.]

Skippy John Podesta is tweeting threats: "Seems like those “unnamed sources peddling second-hand hearsay with rank speculation that continue to leak inaccurate information,” came straight from 1600 Penn. Jared better start wearing his kevlar on his back."

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for the links and the heads up!