Posted on 02/26/2018 12:31:46 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3634529/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
We're having trouble with the websites that we normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
Thanks Tang-soo.
We The People can convene a Grand Jury under the 5th amendment but it is never recognized as an official Grand Jury of the same people unless selected by the current government processes. Just look at all the filings people like Mario Apuzzo and others did following the constitution but were ignored. The American Grand Jury the indicted Zippo was formed under the guidelines of the constitution but if not selected by the good ol boys the indictment isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Should it be? Absolutely.
The law states for instance, grand jury terms are 18 months. There are counties in this country, like in TN, where there are career jury members some of whom have served for decades. The heart of government corruption lies in the grand jury process, just the opposite of it's intention. It was intended for the people to convene and investigate corrupt officials....go figure..
That is sad.
The information and data that we are exposed to will always be a mixture of truth and manipulation. That's the nature of humanity.
The one piece of "truth" that I hope the public at large gets, is that mass media is and always has been inherently DISHONEST and agenda-driven. The press is not a guardian of freedom or truth.I think the truth will come out eventually.
Pure male bovine fecal matter, IMO.
That's right, when you turn on the TV to watch a "news" broadcast, their primary purpose is to attract as many viewers as possible so that they can charge as much $$$ possible from advertisers. Their secondary purpose is to propagandize.
Proving useful information isn't on the list!
Providing, not Proving typo
Metadata doesn't lie.
The only alternative story...she left it sitting on her computer and someone else simply pushed the "send" button after she "officially left".
Either way, it's still her email account.
MSM finally structured themselves with deep state so profit motive was no longer a driver, hence the sudden flood of propaganda when zero first won.
After three days away from Geo Webb one is hopelessly behind... the guy is prolific!
That is always a risk!
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:28:00 -0500 [originator computer]
X-Received: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:26:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:40:06 -0500 (EST) [recipient mail server]
That is a real set of timestamps on a real e-mail. The timestamps in the middle rarely appear to a reader, originator or recipient timestamps are common. I can tell by inspection that the clock on the originator's computer in this case is running about a minute fast. The delay in receipt is "by design," where recipient pulls mail at definite times.
Rice hasn't denied sending the email on January 20. The "dispute" or "confusion" is whether she did so before or after Trump was sworn in, as if THAT makes any difference, other than a point of curiosity.
Most likely explanation for the hinky timestamp is that the computer she originated the memo to self from had a clock running fast.
Here’s Corsi with Lionel NAtion. Dated yestrday. Worth the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aKeIq3_zIw&t=2679s
I’ll be offline for a few hours to take care of paid work.
For all we know, 50% of the public subscribes to the supposedly marginalized points of view. The "approved" messengers would never admit being directed by anything other than a search for truth, but at bottom, EVERYBODY says that, so it's literally a throw-away self-promotion line.
Beware them showing the evidence too. See Dan Rather TxANG forgery and Obama's forged BC.
Misrepresenting facts is "the rule," in my experience, having compared summary reports with the law they cover, or with statements actually made.
Well, it’s a two way street. The impression I get reading between the lines, is that the mediots all know it’s all BS, but it gets the almighty RATINGS. You could say all of them are crisis actors, in a way.
We may see new ‘green shoots’ of conservative, or at least truthful, media soon if Mockingbird really was knee-capped.
That is, media becoming a true marketplace of ideas.
Corsi’s YouTube account has terminated today!
How long does it take to get to and from her office?
And if the email wasn't sent from her office what computer did she use to send the email?
Rhetorical...just thinking out loud.
I think a good part of the truth has always been out there, hiding in plain sight. I don't expect any of the usual MSM to ever be truthful. The very point of being "mass" communication is to regulate (not educate) the masses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.