[sargon]

Given the fact that Q—even if a total fraud—has stimulated massive amounts of research, digging, awareness, etc., I have to opine that it's a net positive beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Accordingly, I have to agree with those who are sensitive regarding gratuitous antagonism.

Even though Q is not a religious topic, it resembles one in some respects. Now, you might not be Catholic—neither am I—but I don't find it necessary to run over to every Catholic thread and piss in their sandbox and accuse them of embracing "Goddess Mythology", etc. Now, I certainly do occasionally "chime in" on Catholic threads, however, when I casually run across absurd claims that Mary was sinless, for instance.

My point is that such shenanigans on my part are kept to a minimum, and not simply used as an opportunity for indulging in derision—especially since the consequences of discussing the topic are unquestionably a net positive...

[JockoManning]

Thanks for your excellent points very well put.

[Windflier]

Given the fact that Q—even if a total fraud—has stimulated massive amounts of research, digging, awareness, etc., I have to opine that it's a net positive

If all this collective digging and research results in actual revelations of actionable evidence, then I agree that it's a net positive.

By the same token, if this is all a wild goose chase, then it's a grand distraction, and can rightfully be judged to be a psyop, implemented to throw millions of our brightest patriots off the scent.

I think the jury's still out on this question.

As far as posting my skeptical views on Q threads, i may stop, but only because I feel pressured to do so by those who take my criticisms of Q as some sort of personal affront.

I think it's a sad commentary on the state of this community, that we've now reached a point where voicing incredulity or skepticism about an unknown, anonymous internet poster, draws ire and anger, rather than reasoned debate.

Thank you for the civil exchange.