To: yesthatjallen
My recent method is to assume Q is a fraud, and to keep reading the drops with that as my basic premise.
4 posted on
02/15/2018 7:29:00 AM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
It’s basic scientific method. Assume the null hypothesis.
6 posted on
02/15/2018 7:29:57 AM PST by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
Same.
My initial thought was Q was a psy-op to dispirit Trump supporters.
If true, working.
7 posted on
02/15/2018 7:30:44 AM PST by
riri
To: reasonisfaith
That’s very similar to how I do it.
29 posted on
02/15/2018 7:58:44 AM PST by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson